• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>New Metropolitan Perspectives - The Integrated Approach of Urban Sustainable Development through the Implementation of Horizon/Europe 2020 >Social Peace and Political Pluralism
【24h】

Social Peace and Political Pluralism

机译：社会和平与政治多元化

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the modern age cultural and political pluralism received the serious consideration of the Enlightenment philosophers. In the contemporary age, it is the centre of attention of several thinkers who tackle the often dramatic problems related to the misrecognition of rights and freedoms in cultural minority groups. Liberalism in its multiple formulations puts the universal principles that ignore differences at the base of its reflections. Philosophers such as Charles Taylor and Michael Walzer often insisted on the political necessity to face the problem of differences, denouncing the historical and cultural limits of the different forms of liberal universalism. By examining the juxtaposition between universalism and communitarism, in this paper I intend to analyse the conflicting aspects of this contrast to obtain the emergence of viewpoints to overcome such conflicts. I will base my analysis on the resources of the recognition of the rights to capabilities, public debate and practical wisdom.
机译：在现代，文化和政治多元主义得到了对启蒙哲学家的认真考虑。在当代时代，这是几个思想家关注的核心，他们应对与文化少数群体中的权利和自由的误解和自由相关的常见戏剧性问题。自由主义在其多种制定中，使普遍原则忽略了其思考基础的差异。 Charles Taylor和Michael Walzer等哲学家经常坚持政治必要性面对差异问题，谴责不同形式的自由主义普遍主义的历史和文化限制。通过审查普遍主义和社会之间的并置，在本文中，我打算分析这种对比的冲突方面，以获得克服这种冲突的观点出现。我将分析了解能力，公开辩论和实践智慧的权利的资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号