• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Aceh Global Conference >Ethnic and Religious Crime in Australian Media: Sensationalism versus Public Interest
【24h】

Ethnic and Religious Crime in Australian Media: Sensationalism versus Public Interest

机译：澳大利亚媒体的种族和宗教犯罪：耸人听闻与公共利益

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Around the world, crime is considered worthy to be reported in terms of news value. However, there is a long debate about the importance of revealing the ethnicity and religion of the accused in the crime reporting. This article discusses the relevance of ethnicity and religion of the perpetrators in the crime news coverage in Australia. This issue is analyzed using the perspectives of the Journalists' Code of Ethics, anti-vilification laws, public interest defense, ethical philosophy and the rules of reporting court cases in Australia. Based on the analysis, it is found that the attribution of ethnicity and religion of the accused is not necessary for reporting crime. Highlighting the ethnicity and religion is to seek profit and promote certain political agenda since it only occurs when the perpetrators are Middle Eastern people and Muslims. Such attribution also breaches the Journalists' Code of Ethics and anti-vilification laws in Australia. Such conduct cannot be ethically justified as it could incite hatred towards Muslim/Middle Eastern people and harm multiculturalism in Australia.
机译：在世界各地，犯罪被认为是值得的新闻价值方面的报道。然而，有关于揭示被告人在共同犯罪中报告的种族和宗教的重要性，经过长时间的辩论。本文讨论了在澳大利亚的犯罪新闻报道肇事者的种族和宗教的相关性。这个问题是用道德，反诽谤的法律，公共利益辩护，道德哲学和澳大利亚报告法院案件的规则的新闻工作者守则的角度进行分析。根据分析，发现被告的种族和宗教的归属是没有必要的报案。突出民族和宗教是寻求利润和促进某些政治议程，因为它只有在肇事者是中东人和穆斯林发生。这样的归属也违背了新闻工作者的道德规范和澳大利亚反诽谤法。这种行为不能被道德理由，因为它可能煽动仇恨走向穆斯林/中东人，在澳大利亚多元文化的伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号