• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference of Democratisation in Southeast Asia >Social Engineering Model for Empowering the Poor in the Border Areas of Pandeglang Regency and Serang Regency
【24h】

Social Engineering Model for Empowering the Poor in the Border Areas of Pandeglang Regency and Serang Regency

机译：潘刚丽晶及苏阳丽晶边境地区赋予穷人的社会工程模式

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

By using the concept of poverty (causes, measurement of poverty and dimensions of poverty), the concept of community empowerment, the concept of education, the concept of public health, infrastructure development, the concept of purchasing power and the concept of village potential, researchers attempt to analyze these concepts and formulate the proper engineering models of social empowerment in eradicating poverty in the bordering areas is seen from the point of view of education, health, purchasing power and infrastructure. This research used qualitative methods with a case study approach. The technique of collecting data used in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation. Meanwhile, the data analysis used qualitative methods, supported with quantitative data. The informants interviewed were divided into 2 large groups, namely government representatives consisting of Regional Working Unit (OPD) related to poverty eradication and community representatives. This research focuses on areas that have connection as causes of poverty and potentially create appropriate empowerment models for the community, namely: education, health, purchasing, and infrastructure. Through this research, it is expected to be used as a model for other regions where the poverty level of the people is still high so that it is expected to reduce the poverty rate in Banten Province, especially in Pandeglang Regency. The results of this research explain that the social engineering model for empowering the poor begin with the policies and implementation of the central and regional governments through the relevant agencies to develop various infrastructure facilities which included: 1) educational facilities; 2) health facilities; 3) transportations; 4) economic facilities and 5) settlement facilities, which begin with the process of identifying problems, community needs, supporting local nature conditions, assessing feasibility, and finally the development actions, then monitoring and maintaining the infrastructure facilities together with the community and village officials and build continuity.
机译：通过利用贫困概念（贫困贫困和贫困的尺寸），社区赋权的概念，教育概念，公共卫生概念，基础设施发展，购买力的概念和村庄潜力的概念，研究人员试图分析这些概念，并从教育，健康，采购力和基础设施的角度来看，在贫困地区发现贫困的社会赋权的适当工程模型。本研究采用了案例研究方法使用定性方法。收集使用深入访谈，参与性观察和文件的数据的技术。同时，数据分析使用定性方法，支持定量数据。采访的线人分为2个大团体，即由与贫穷和社区代表有关的区域工作单位（OPD）组成的政府代表。本研究重点介绍与贫困原因有关的领域，并可能为社区创建适当的赋权模式，即：教育，健康，采购和基础设施。通过这项研究，预计将被用作人民贫困水平仍然很高的其他地区的模型，以便预计将减少巴特登省的贫困率，特别是在潘丹省植物中。本研究的结果解释说，赋予穷人的社会工程模式从相关机构开发中央政府和区域各国政府的政策和实施，以制定包括：1）教育设施的各种基础设施; 2）卫生设施; 3）运输; 4）经济设施和5个）结算设施，从识别问题，社区需求，支持当地性质条件，评估可行性以及最终发展行动，然后与社区和村民官员一起监测和维护基础设施的过程并建立连续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号