• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics >Do Age and Experience Level Affect Views of Pilots' Towards Cockpit Automation
【24h】

Do Age and Experience Level Affect Views of Pilots' Towards Cockpit Automation

机译：年龄和体验水平影响飞行员对驾驶舱自动化的看法

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Pilots trained over the last 20 years are more likely to have learned to use cockpit automation as an inherent part of their training when compared to pilots trained in earlier eras who first learned to fly and then were trained in the use of automation. Cockpit automation facilitated the elimination of the flight engineer from the crew and shifted the remaining cockpit crew member's focus from hands on control to programmers and monitors of automated systems that can control the vertical and horizontal flight path for most of the flight. Some airline companies are accepting applicants for pilot training with no previous flight experience, this trend is unprecedented in the history of commercial flight in the US. While automation has improved the safety and efficiency of commercial flights, it has created new concerns relating to loss of manual flying skills and issues of mode confusion and the phenomenon of automation surprises. This paper analyzes the correlation between the pilots' perspectives and their demographics. A total of 77 pilots who operate highly automated cockpit systems participated in this research. Each question was analyzed regarding correlation by using R software and the Spearman Correlation Analysis method. Some of the questions revealed there is a significant difference towards cockpit automation when we consider the pilots' perspectives. This survey also revealed the pilots perspectives about their companies. Older pilots are more likely to think that their companies do not allow them to fly manually often enough. Although airline company policies are similar, the survey responses reflected that older pilots are not happy with those policies as well. Three demographic specifications were used for the Spearman's Correlation Analysis. Age was one specification and the other two were Flight Time correlation and Seat correlation (Captain versus First Officer). The total number of questions for five dimensions was 37 and 9 of these questions resul
机译：在过去20年中培训的飞行员更有可能学会使用驾驶舱自动化作为他们培训的固有部分，与早期的Eras培训的飞行员相比，他们首先学会飞行，然后在使用自动化时受过培训。驾驶舱自动化促进了从船员中取消飞行工程师，并将剩余的驾驶舱船员成员的焦点从控制器转移到控制器，并监控可以控制大部分飞行的垂直和水平飞行路径的自动化系统。一些航空公司公司正在接受试点培训的申请人，没有以前的飞行经验，这一趋势在美国商业航班的历史上是前所未有的。虽然自动化改善了商业航班的安全性和效率，但它创造了与手动飞行技能丧失和模式混乱问题有关的新关切，以及自动化惊喜的现象。本文分析了飞行员观点与人口统计学之间的相关性。共有77名飞行员经营高度自动驾驶舱系统，参与了这项研究。通过使用R软件和Spearman相关性分析方法分析每个问题。一些问题显示，当我们考虑飞行员的观点时，对驾驶舱自动化有显着差异。该调查还揭示了飞行员对其公司的观点。较旧的飞行员更有可能认为他们的公司不允许他们常常飞行。虽然航空公司政策是相似的，但调查反应反映了老年飞行员也对这些政策不满意。三个人口统计规范用于Spearman的相关分析。年龄是一个规范，另外两个是飞行时间相关性和座位关联（船长与第一官）。五个维度的问题总数为37和9项这些问题

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号