• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Operations Research >A Comparison of Two Visualisation Methods for Decision Support in MCDM Problems
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Visualisation Methods for Decision Support in MCDM Problems

机译：MCDM问题中两种可视化方法的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

1 Introduction By using outranking-methods like Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) [1], it is possible to include the alternatives, the relevant criteria and the personal preferences of each decision maker in the decision process. PROMETHEE is based on the pairwise comparison of the alternatives for each single criterion. With respect to personal preferences and weightings of the criteria by the decision maker an order of the alternatives is proposed. As an illustrative case study, the simplified comparison of different mobility concept is taken as an example. Rising energy prices, a strong dependency on fossil fuels and climbing C O2 emissions are just some aspects that can have a great impact on future mobility behaviour. Table 1 shows exemplary data on mobility concepts of electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles and fuel cell vehicles which are compared to a conventional fossil fuel vehicle.
机译：1引言通过使用偏好排名组织方法进行丰富评估（Promethee）[1]，可以在决策过程中包括各种决策者的替代方案，相关标准和个人喜好。 Promethee基于每个单一标准的替代方案的成对比较。关于决策者标准的个人偏好和重量，提出了替代方案的命令。作为说明性案例研究，作为示例采用不同移动概念的简化比较。能源价格上涨，对化石燃料和攀登C O2排放的强有力依赖性只是对未来流动行为产生巨大影响的一些方面。表1示出了与传统化石燃料车辆相比的电动车辆，混合动力车辆和燃料电池车辆的移动概念的示例性数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号