• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue >Discourse theories vs. Topic-Focus articulation applied to prosodic focus assignment in Romanian
【24h】

Discourse theories vs. Topic-Focus articulation applied to prosodic focus assignment in Romanian

机译：话语理论与主题 - 焦点关节应用于罗马尼亚山箭焦点分配

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ldquohellipit is not the argument structure that triggers the intonational phrasing, but the [discourse, subclausal n.b.] relation of backgrounding.rdquo (K. von Heusinger, 2007) Is it? If yes, how? The present paper, maintaining our attempts for applying Prague School's Topic-Focus Articulation (TFA) algorithm on the syntax-prosody interface of Romanian, proposes two comparative lines of investigation for the intonational focus assignment: (A) The TFA algorithm is improved at clause level with hints from Gussenhoven's SAAR (Sentence Accent Assignment Rule), then extended to inter-clause level, i.e. complex sentences. The new shape of the TFA algorithm is applied to compute the Topic-Focus values in the discursive context, while the information-structural (IS) spans of Theme(s)-Rheme(s) are detached, at clause level, as lowest-highest degrees of Communicative Dynamism (CD) vs. Systemic Order (SO). (B) The second approach we experiment for assigning intonational focus and phrasing is based on the combined and intensive use of discourse theories for computing the IS categories and structures: the Background-Kontrast entities (associated with the Prague School's Topic-Focus) are obtained with Asher's (1993) Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT) analysis, while Theme-Rheme structures within the finite clause are computed with Leong's (2004) Inference-Boundary (IB) algorithm (of Hallidayan inspiration), applied for the first time to Romanian. Furthermore, this second direction is inspired from and joins the IS-discourse theory proposed by Heusinger (2007), which relies on SDRT inter-clausal evolution of discourse variables for computing the Background-Kontrast. While maintaining the classical SDRT (including rhetorical) discourse relations at the inter-clause level, Heusinger introduces a set of IS-semantics relations, and hands down at sub-clause level the rhetorical and focus particle relations with significant role in intonational-prosodic phrasing. Ex- amples of these two types of research are compared to a gold, intonationally annotated set of Romanian sentences, the proposed theoretical and procedural techniques aiming to balance the pessimistic-realistic view on prosody prediction that it is the speaker-presupposition (and hearer-accommodation) which determines the IS focal scopes, rather than the bare text.
机译：ldquohellipit不是触发宗教措辞的参数结构，而是[话语，亚洲人N.B.]的背景.RDQUO（K.Von Heusinger，2007）是吗？如果是，怎么样？本文维持我们在罗马尼亚语法展示（TFA）算法上应用Prague学校的主题焦点关节（TFA）算法的尝试，提出了两个对互义焦点的比较调查表：（a）TFA算法在条款下得到改善随着Gussenhoven的遗址（句子口音分配规则）的提示，然后扩展到间级别，即复杂句子。应用TFA算法的新形状以计算话语上下文中的主题对焦值，而主题的信息（IS）-Rheme（s）跨度在条款级别，如最低 - 最高程度的交流动态度（CD）与系统秩序（SO）。 （b）我们分配互动焦点和措辞的第二种方法是基于用于计算类别和结构的话语理论的组合和密集使用：背景 - 康拉特实体（与布拉格学校的主题焦点相关）随着asher（1993）分段的话语代表理论（SDRT）分析，而有限条款内的主题 - reme结构与Leong的（2004）推断 - 边界（IB）算法（Hallidayan Inspiration）计算，第一次申请罗马尼亚语。此外，这第二方向受到了Heusinger（2007）提出的“是讨厌的是话语变量依赖于用于计算背景 - 康威尔特的人际话语的互相际话语的基于SDRT的互相际演变。在维持条款间水平级别的古典SDRT（包括修辞）的话语的同时，Heusinger引入了一系列的是语义关系，并在子项级别逐步递减，以宗教博物馆措辞中的重大作用。与这两种研究的expples相比，与金，通知的罗马尼亚句子集合，旨在平衡韵律预测的悲观 - 实际观点，即它是演讲者 - 预测（和听众 - 住宿）确定是焦点范围，而不是裸露的文本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号