• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Technology,Education and Development Conference >(216)ACCREDITATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA: A GENDERSTUDY
【24h】

(216)ACCREDITATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA: A GENDERSTUDY

机译：（216）格拉纳达大学的认证：一个婚礼

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The cornerstone upon which underpins the European Higher Education Area is thequality and proof of this is that it seeks to achieve the highest quality in all possibleparameters that underlie this EHEA. To measure the quality and to have mutual trustbetween the different institutions of higher education between countries requires acommon methodology and cost evaluation and quality accreditation. Therefore havedeveloped various mechanisms and agencies at national or autonomous level in Spain,the Agencia Nacional para la Evaluacion de la Calidad has faced enormous challenges inachieving the goals outlined in the Universities Act (Title V) [1] on issues such asassessment, certification and accreditation of teaching activities, research and teachingmanagement, activities, facilities management among others, all aimed to promote qualityteaching and research in Spanish Universities.In The Organic Law 4 / 2007 of 12 April [2] set a new definition of the hierarchies ofuniversity staff and one of the most important definitions are level of professors ofuniversity and lectures. Also it achieves and a new procedure for access to thosehierarchies that require prior authorization from accreditation. The new procedure foraccreditation has been the subject of great controversy and is being widely criticized byunions of workers. But there seems to be consensus that a clearer and more objectivesystem than the previous system of rating.In the present work, show the results of a study on the impact that has had this procedurein the sex distribution in the categories of professor and lectures in the University ofGranada, in which is easy to appreciate a significant change in this distribution. The studywas also performed separately in different scientific areas, and compared with aggregatedata from all Spanish universities.It also discusses gender composition of the committees that have considered the squaresconvened at the University of Granada from the new system and how the rule developedby the university has influenced this aspect.
机译：基于欧洲高等教育领域的基石是他的正式和证据，是它可以寻求实现这一ehea的所有可能参数的最高品质。为了衡量质量，并在各国之间的不同高等教育机构拥有相互抵制，需要Acommon方法和成本评估和质量认证。因此，在西班牙的国家或自主水平有权开发了各种机制和机构，Agencia Nacional Para La Evaluacion de La Calidad面临着巨大的挑战，凭借大学法案（TITEV）[1]在诸如assasessment，认证和认证等问题上的目标概念教学活动，研究和教学，活动，设施管理等，旨在促进西班牙大学的质量展和研究。在4月12日的有机法律4/2007 [2]中规定了一系列层次职工的新定义最重要的定义是大学和讲座的教授水平。此外，它还实现了从认证中获取先前授权的那些访问的新程序。新的程序Foraccreditation是争议争议的主题，并被广泛批评工人的禁止。但似乎有达成共识，更清晰，更具目标系统比以前的评级系统。在目前的工作中，表明了对这一程序在教授和讲座类别中的性分配的影响的研究结果大学的奥格拉达，在这方面很容易理解这种分布的重大变化。该学习瓦斯还在不同的科学领域分别进行，与来自所有西班牙大学的聚会相比。它还讨论了在新系统中审议了格拉纳达大学的委员会的性别组成以及大学的统治如何受到影响这方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号