• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Technology,Education and Development Conference >(427)OUTSIDE THE BOX: LMS VERSUS SOCIAL TOOLS
【24h】

(427)OUTSIDE THE BOX: LMS VERSUS SOCIAL TOOLS

机译：（427）框外：LMS与社交工具

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This work has the goal to study the impact of social tools in e-learning. Lack of studentparticipation and intrinsic motivation in online learning environments is a challenge toinstructional design. There are some online communities which overcome this challengeby attracting participants from diverse backgrounds to engage, learn, and shareinformation within their context. In these implications, one discusses the identifiablecharacteristics and addresses some strategies to implement them in learningenvironments. Technological innovations do not necessarily bring innovations in onlinelearning. It is rather philosophical and methodological considerations that can yield toinnovations in online learning. Participants are intrinsically motivated to be engaged withwhat the community has to offer and learn from these interactions. With the advance ofcommunication and transportation technologies, the term "community" has transformedinto new meanings. Before, a community was dependent on the physical location of itsmembers. Members who were located far away from the center of the community hadweaker connections, due to communication difficulties. Technological innovationsenabled new ways creating communities. Computer-mediated communications enabledpeople to communicate regularly without significant costs and without being in closeproximity. The two basic attributes of an online community are bonding and culture. Acommunity, generally, is not a chain of one-on-one relationships;it is rather a web ofaffect-laden relationships that encompasses a group of individuals. This is bonding.Secondly, a community should have a set of shared values, and historical identity. This isshortly the culture of the community. The study of how a community works may informonline learning environment design endeavors, especially in regards to philosophical andthe methodological issues. Analysis is made as to social tools should also be used andintegrated or not into an LMS. Finally considerations are made about the monitoringmade to the learning process once one is taking a course lodged in an LMS.
机译：这项工作必须研究社会工具在电子学习中的影响。在线学习环境中缺乏学生颗粒和内在动机是一个挑战Toinstructional设计。有一些在线社区，克服了吸引各种背景中的参与者参与其背景信息中的参与者的挑战。在这些影响中，讨论了识别的细节，并解决了在学习环境中实施了一些策略。技术创新不一定带来on-inlinearnern的创新。它是相当哲学和方法的考虑，可以在网上学习中产生Toinovation。与会者在本质上有动力，与社区必须提供和学习这些互动。随着通信和运输技术的进步，“社区”一词已经转变了新含义。之前，社区依赖于其物理的位置。由于沟通困难，位于社区中心地区的遥远的成员。技术创新创造社区的新方法。计算机介导的通信Enablepeople定期沟通，无需大量成本，而不具有封闭性。在线社区的两个基本属性是粘合和文化。一般而言，aceomunity不是一对一关系的链;它相当是携带一群人的关系的网络。这是绑定。它，社区应该有一组共享价值和历史身份。这是社区的文化。关于社区工作原理的研究可以是英语线程学习环境设计的努力，特别是在哲学和方法问题方面。分析应该是社会工具，也应该使用和解或不进入LMS。一旦在LMS中提出课程，就会对学习过程进行关于监测过程的监督者的考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号