首页> 外文会议>Strategies for Risk Communication: Evolution, Evidence, Experience >Science, Precaution, and the Politicsof Technological Risk Converging Implications in Evolutionary and SocialScientific Perspectives
【24h】

Science, Precaution, and the Politicsof Technological Risk Converging Implications in Evolutionary and SocialScientific Perspectives

机译:科学,预防措施和技术风险融合在进化和社会科学观点中的影响

获取原文

摘要

This paper examines apparent tensions between "science-based," "precautionary," and "partici-patory" approaches to decision making on risk. Partly by reference to insights currently emergingin evolutionary studies, the present paper looks for ways to reconcile some of the contradictions.First, I argue that technological evolution is a much more plural and open-ended process than isconventionally supposed. Risk politics is thus implicitly as much about social choice of technolog-ical pathways as narrow issues of safety. Second, it is shown how conventional "science-based"risk assessment techniques address only limited aspects of incomplete knowledge in complex,dynamic, evolutionary processes. Together, these understandings open the door to more sophisti-cated, comprehensive, rational, and robust decision-making processes. Despite their own limita-tions, it is found that precautionary and participatory approaches help to address these needs. Aconcrete framework is outlined through which the synergies can be more effectively harnessed. Bythis means, we can hope simultaneously to improve scientific rigor and democratic legitimacy inrisk governance.
机译:本文研究了“基于科学,”的“预防性”和“Partici-Patory”方法之间的明显紧张局势,以造成风险的决策方法。部分通过引用目前展示的历史进化研究,本文寻求调和一些矛盾的方法。首先,我认为技术演变是比不可思议的更为复数和开放的过程。因此,风险政治与社会选择的技术 - ICE途径视为狭隘的安全问题。其次,示出了如何在复杂,动态,进化过程中的不完全知识的有限方面地解决了常规的“科学”风险评估技术。这些理解在一起,将门打开到更熟悉的,全面,理性,强大的决策过程。尽管他们自己的限制,但发现预防和参与式方法有助于解决这些需求。概述了加密框架,通过该框架通过该框架,可以更有效地利用协同作用。这意味着,我们可以同时希望改善科学严峻和民主合法性的InRisk治理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号