• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Computer Aided Design: Learning Style Preference Effect on
【24h】

Computer Aided Design: Learning Style Preference Effect on

机译：计算机辅助设计：学习风格偏好效果

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the Computer Aided Design (CAD) course at the United States Military Academy (West Point, NY), students learn two different design software packages, SolidWorks and MATLAB. In the past, faculty members who are responsible for teaching the course have observed a difference in performance by the students in course homework assignments and examinations between the two applications. In general, students performed higher on SolidWorks assignments. This poses the question: Does learning style preference affect the ability to learn different computer aided design tools? One hundred and eleven students enrolled in either the Spring 2012 (n = 61) or Fall 2013 (n = 50) semesters of Computer-Aided Design were asked to participate in this Institutional Review Board exempted study. Each student was asked to take Felder's and Soloman's "Index of Learning Styles" questionnaire. Of the four learning dimensions that are evaluated in the questionnaire, only the scores for two, Visual versus Verbal and Sequential versus Global, were examined in this study. These two dimensions seem to be most relevant to the research question. We expected that SolidWorks was more suited to learners who tend to be more visually and globally-oriented. Conversely, we expected MATLAB to be more suited for more verbally and sequentially-oriented students. This paper discusses the results of our study. The raw data in the Visual/Verbal domain appear to support our hypothesis to suggest that verbal learners perform better in MATLAB programming than in SolidWorks modeling, whereas visual learners have a less distinct difference in performance. A survey of students also indicates that a higher percentage of verbal learners prefer MATLAB compared to their visual counterparts.
机译：在计算机辅助设计（CAD）课程在美国军校（West Point，NY），学生学习两种不同的设计软件包，SolidWorks和Matlab。在过去，负责教学课程的教师会员观察了学生在两种申请之间的作业作业和考试中的表现差异。一般来说，学生在SolidWorks作业上表现更高。这造成了问题：学习风格偏好是否会影响学习不同计算机辅助设计工具的能力？在2012年春季（n = 61）或2013年秋季（n = 50）的计算机辅助设计的学期征收一百个11名学生被要求参加这个机构审查委员会豁免研究。每个学生都被要求采取Felder的和Soloman的“学习方式指数”问卷调查问卷。在调查问卷中评估的四个学习尺寸中，在这项研究中唯一只有两个，视觉与口头和序贯与全球相比的分数。这两个维度似乎与研究问题最相关。我们希望SolidWorks更适合学习者，他们往往更具视觉和全球导向。相反，我们预计Matlab更适合更加口头和依次定向的学生。本文讨论了我们研究的结果。 Visual / Nambal Domain中的原始数据似乎支持我们的假设，表明口头学习者在Matlab编程中表现优于SolidWorks建模，而Visual Meversers对性能具有较小的差异。对学生的调查还表明，与视觉同行相比，更高百分比的口头学习者更喜欢Matlab。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号