首页> 外文会议>International Congress on Coronary Artery Disease. >Efficacy and Safety of Right Versus Left Transradial Approach for Invasive Coronary Procedures in Octogenarian Patients
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Right Versus Left Transradial Approach for Invasive Coronary Procedures in Octogenarian Patients

机译:术语术语患者侵袭性冠状动脉术治疗右颅跨度方法的疗效和安全性

获取原文

摘要

From 2006 to 2012, 3,153 invasive coronary procedures in octogenarian patients were performed by transradial approach (TRA) as initial route of access at our center. The initial approach was RRA in 2,905 patients (92.1%) and LRA in 248 patients (7.9%). Subclavian tortuosity was more frequent in the right side (16.5% vs 8.6%; p=0.02), but procedural failure rate was similar in RRA and LRA groups (RRA 6.8% vs LRA 6.7%; p = 0.97). Mean procedural time, mean fluoroscopy time and dose area product were similar in both groups. Vascular complication rate was 2.1% and 2.2% with RRA and LRA, respectively (p=0.80).
机译:从2006年到2012年,雌激素患者中的3,153例侵入性冠状动脉术通过跨大型方法(TRA)作为我们中心访问的初始访问途径进行。初始方法是RA在2,905名患者(92.1%)和248名患者(7.9%)中的LRA。亚克拉夫曲折在右侧更频繁(16.5%vs 8.6%; P = 0.02),但Rra和LRA组的程序失败率类似(RRA 6.8%VS LRA 6.7%; P = 0.97)。两个组中的平均程序时间,平均透视时间和剂量面积产品相似。 RA和LRA分别为血管并发症率为2.1%和2.2%(P = 0.80)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号