• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>AMA Winter Marketing Educators Conference >DEVELOPING REGULATIONS ON CURBING SMOKING IN PRIVATE SHARED PLACES USING PLACE ATTACHMENT THEORY
【24h】

DEVELOPING REGULATIONS ON CURBING SMOKING IN PRIVATE SHARED PLACES USING PLACE ATTACHMENT THEORY

机译：利用地方附属理论制定私人共用地区遏制吸烟的法规

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this presentation is to stimulate scholarly discussion on how place attachment literature can make a contribution to the emerging policy debate on approaches to regulate smoking in private shared places. We focus specifically on homes and cars due to negative health impacts associated with both secondhand (SHS) and thirdhand (THS) smoke (e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] 2006; Sleiman et al. 2010). Homes continue to be unregulated areas where non-smokers living with smokers suffer high levels of SHS (Oberg et al. 2011). The increased awareness of the dangers of SHS is prompting developers and home owners or tenants to take action to restrict smoking in private homes. Recent cases include two cities in California, USA which have passed laws prohibiting smoking inside multi-unit residential buildings (McKindley 2009; Semrad 2007). New developments of social housing in Waterloo, Canada are also non-smoking (see Regional Municipality of Waterloo Community Services Committee Report 2011 for details and evaluation results). Developers are also offering completely smoke-free rental apartments (Feldman 2010) and many New York apartments have smoke-free policies or are debating enacting them (Hughes 2009). Furthermore, there is general support among owners and managers of multi-unit housing for smoke-free policies (King et al. 2010) which is important given that living in multi-unit housing is known to be associated with SHS exposure (e.g., Kraev et al. 2009) and because a large percentage of the population live in multi-unit dwellings. Nevertheless, instances of regulating smoking in the home are relatively rare but discussions and media reports continue.
机译：本演示文稿的目的是刺激学术讨论依托依附文学如何对新兴政策辩论对规范私人共享地方吸烟的辩论做出贡献。由于与二手（SHS）和三手（THS）烟雾相关的负面的健康影响，我们专注于家庭和汽车（例如，疾病控制和预防的中心，2006; Sleman等，2010）。房屋继续是不受管制的区域，其中患有吸烟者的非吸烟者遭受高水平的SHS（Oberg等人2011）。提高了对SHS危险的认识，促使开发人员和房屋所有者或租户采取行动限制在私人住宅中吸烟。最近的案件包括美国加利福尼亚州的两个城市，该城市已通过禁止在多单位住宅建筑内吸烟的法律（McKindley 2009; Semrad 2007）。加拿大滑铁卢的社会住房的新发展也禁止吸烟（见2011年Waterloo社区服务委员会的区域市，了解详情和评估结果）。开发商还提供完全无烟的租赁公寓（Feldman 2010），许多纽约公寓拥有无烟政策或正在辩论颁布它们（Hughes 2009）。此外，对于无烟政策的多单位住房（King等人，2010）的多单位住房的所有者和管理人员都有一般的支持，这是鉴于生活在多单元外壳中的重要性，也是与SHS曝光相关的（例如，Kraev等等，因为2009年），因为大量的人口生活在多单位住宅中。尽管如此，在家中调节吸烟的情况是相对罕见的，但讨论和媒体报道继续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号