• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business Conference >The significance of amenable mortality quantification for financing the health system in Slovakia
【24h】

The significance of amenable mortality quantification for financing the health system in Slovakia

机译：斯洛伐克融资卫生系统融资的可接受死亡率量化的重要性

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The indicators' values of health condition of the Slovak citizens significantly lag behind the most developed countries. The issue of healthy inhabitants is more connected with a treatment of bad health condition than with a non-health prevention, which is believed to be caused by social and political development over the last decades. Measuring the influence of health system on inhabitants' health is very difficult due to the influences of various factors, such as wealth, socio-economic status, citizen's lifestyle, quality of environments, etc. Consequently, an amenable mortality indicator is used to evaluate the health system except of the life expectancy indicator. It defines a mortality that should not have occurred in case of effective and early treatment. It only takes into consideration those diagnoses, where effective treatment exists before a certain age limit (75 years) according to experts. The number of these deaths is standardized on 100,000 citizens. The amenable mortality indicator has a great significance for standard comparisons, however, its application also causes methodological issues, such as data quality of mortality, choice of diagnoses, weight of diagnoses, etc. In the international comparing, it is very often deduced from a fact that each country spends different amount of funds on health, while the differences may be connected with a different effectiveness of invested funds in the health systems. The article reflects on the given facts and its aim is to evaluate the development of amenable mortality in Slovakia over the last ten years, as well as to compare the development of this indicator in the EU countries. Similarly, it assesses the significant methodological issues that are related to indicator's application and defines the causes of extreme differences that were found out by the results on the basis of the given outputs.
机译：指标的斯洛伐克公民的健康状况值显著落后于​​大多数发达国家落后。居民健康的问题多与治疗的不良健康状况比非保健预防，这被认为是社会和政治的发展在过去几十年造成的连接。测量卫生系统对居民健康的影响是由于各种因素，如财富的影响非常困难，社会经济状况，市民的生活方式，环境的质量，等等。因此，一个适合死亡率指标来评价卫生系统除了预期寿命指标中。它定义了不应该发生在有效的和早期治疗的情况下的死亡率。只需要考虑那些诊断，其中有效的治疗方法之前，据专家介绍了一定的年龄限制（75岁）的存在。这些死亡的人数是标准化的10万个公民。在适合的死亡率指标有标准比较具有重要的意义，但是，它的应用也使方法问题，如死亡率数据质量，诊断的选择，重量诊断等在国际比较，这是非常经常从推导事实上，每个国家不同的花量对健康的资金，而差异可能与资金投入在卫生系统不同的有效性进行连接。这篇文章反映了在给定的事实，其目的是在过去十年评估斯洛伐克适合死亡率的发展，以及比较在欧盟国家这一指标的发展。同样，评估所涉及指标的应用显著方法问题，并定义的由给定输出的基础上，结果发现，极端差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号