• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning >Comparison of Two Kinds of Indirect Evaporative Cooling System: To Produce Cold Water and To Produce Cooling Air
【24h】

Comparison of Two Kinds of Indirect Evaporative Cooling System: To Produce Cold Water and To Produce Cooling Air

机译：两种间接蒸发冷却系统的比较：生产冷水并产生冷却空气

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Indirect evaporative cooling system to produce cold water and indirect evaporative cooling system to produce cooling air are compared in this paper. From the process transformation, to remove the same quantity of indoor heat, the indirect evaporative air cooler system produces much more cooling energy in which more than a half is wasted to cool fresh air and also more heat transfer area are used. Also the transportation electricity consumption is much higher when using cooling air than using cold water. Two real applications are given, from the field testing data, the system COP of the indirect evaporative cooling system to produce cold water was 4.6-5.9, which is 1-2 higher than the system COP of the system to produce cooling air. Thus, using the indirect evaporative chillers to produce cold water to remove indoor sensible heat is better than using the indirect evaporative air coolers to produce cooling air.
机译：在本文中比较了间接蒸发冷却系统，以产生冷水和间接蒸发冷却系统以产生冷却空气。从过程变换中，为了去除相同数量的室内热量，间接蒸发空气冷却器系统产生更多的冷却能量，其中浪费了多于半的冷却以冷却新鲜空气，并且还使用更多的传热区域。使用冷却空气比使用冷水，运输电力消耗还高得多。从现场测试数据提供两个真实应用，间接蒸发冷却系统的系统COP为产生冷水为4.6-5.9，比系统的系统COP高出1-2，以产生冷却空气。因此，使用间接蒸发冷却器产生冷水以除去室内明智的热量比使用间接蒸发空气冷却器更好地产生冷却空气。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号