• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium >Urban and Spatial Opposition by the Subject
【24h】

Urban and Spatial Opposition by the Subject

机译：受试者的城市和空间反对

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the production of spaces, an important aspect, that is 'the subject' was neglected with the influence of the industrial revolution, modernisation, capitalism and neo-liberalism. While the rationalist reason was standardising and extending production, the relationship between space and its user was broken-off. It initiated a tremendous change when the subject as the user of the spaces, singled out his own existence and needs from the whole and comprehended his self-distinctiveness. Such a split up indicating the act of critical thinking and liberation of the subject also created a demand for diversity. The demands of the subject being the user of the space was not met at the architectural and urban levels for several reasons. The subject feeling the discomfort of such a situation brings into view his criticisms first in his own individual space and then in public space for the purposes of expressing his right to live and his locus standi. Such acts being classified as adversary are being realised in order to provide the adaptability of the subject and the space to changing living conditions using different means. Such adversary touches being provided partly by the urbanites and partly by the professionals draw attention to the issue through by-pass interventions to the architecturally choked urban areas. By taking a stance against the existing situation, the intention is to treat space in a different way than what has been produced by the system, to re-produce it and to render it more democratic. All such alternative spatial situations show us that other production methods and lines of thought, other than what has been defined by the dominant market conditions are also possible. It has been asserted through these adversary instigations that there is a requirement for micro designs towards the daily and changing needs of the subject as a user during the act of design by architects and planners. For this reason, the part played by the designer should be wriggled out of 'defining' and 'controlling' effects and should turn towards using the transformational power of the society for the benefit of the same, lead the user and provide alternatives.
机译：在生产的空间，一个重要的方面，那就是“主体”与工业革命，现代化，资本主义和新自由主义的影响忽略不计。虽然理性原因进行了标准化和延伸生产，空间和其用户之间的关系被打破断。它启动时的主题为空间的用户，从整体挑出自己的存在和需要，理解他的自我独特性了翻天覆地的变化。这样的分裂，指示也创造了多样性的需求主体的批判性思维和解放的行为。主题是空间的用户的需求，在建筑和城市水平未达到以下几个原因。主题感觉的这样的情况带来的不适进入查看他的批评首先在自己的个人空间，然后在表达他生存的权利，他的发言权的目的的公共空间。被分类为敌方这种行为，以便提供所述对象的适应性和空间来使用不同的方法改变生活条件得以实现。这样的对手倒是被部分由城市居民，部分由专业人员进行干预绕过到建筑哽咽市区提请注意的问题提供。通过采取立场，反对在现有的情况下，其目的是为了治疗空间比已经由系统产生不同的方式，来重新制造它，并使它更加民主。所有这些替代空间的情况告诉我们，其他的生产方式和思想的线条，比已经由市场主导的条件规定的其他也是可能的。已通过这些对手instigations有用于向着主体为设计由建筑师和规划师的行为过程中用户的日常和不断变化的需求的微设计的要求断言。出于这个原因，由设计师所扮演的角色应该“定义”和“控制”的效果，应该向着利用社会的变革力量的相同的利益，引导用户和提供替代品来蠕动出来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号