• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium >Urban and Spatial Opposition by the Subject
【24h】

Urban and Spatial Opposition by the Subject

机译：受试者的城市和空间反对

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the production of spaces, an important aspect, that is 'the subject' was neglected with the influence of the industrial revolution, modernisation, capitalism and neo-liberalism. While the rationalist reason was standardising and extending production, the relationship between space and its user was broken-off. It initiated a tremendous change when the subject as the user of the spaces, singled out his own existence and needs from the whole and comprehended his self-distinctiveness. Such a split up indicating the act of critical thinking and liberation of the subject also created a demand for diversity. The demands of the subject being the user of the space was not met at the architectural and urban levels for several reasons. The subject feeling the discomfort of such a situation brings into view his criticisms first in his own individual space and then in public space for the purposes of expressing his right to live and his locus standi. Such acts being classified as adversary are being realised in order to provide the adaptability of the subject and the space to changing living conditions using different means. Such adversary touches being provided partly by the urbanites and partly by the professionals draw attention to the issue through by-pass interventions to the architecturally choked urban areas. By taking a stance against the existing situation, the intention is to treat space in a different way than what has been produced by the system, to re-produce it and to render it more democratic. All such alternative spatial situations show us that other production methods and lines of thought, other than what has been defined by the dominant market conditions are also possible. It has been asserted through these adversary instigations that there is a requirement for micro designs towards the daily and changing needs of the subject as a user during the act of design by architects and planners. For this reason, the part played by the designer should be wriggled out of 'defining' and 'controlling' effects and should turn towards using the transformational power of the society for the benefit of the same, lead the user and provide alternatives.
机译：在生产空间的生产中，忽视了工业革命，现代化，资本主义和新自由主义的影响，这是“主题”的一个重要方面。虽然理性主义者的理由是标准化和扩展生产，但空间与用户之间的关系被禁止。它在作为空间的用户作为空间的用户，从整体上挑出自己的存在和需求并了解了他的自我独特性时，它发起了巨大的变化。这样的分裂表明对象的批判性思维和解放的行为也造成了对多样性的需求。由于几个原因，在建筑和城市水平上没有在建筑和城市水平上达到对象的要求。感到这种情况不适的主题带来了他自己的个人空间，然后在公共场所中批评他的批评，以便表达他的生活和他的遗址立场的目的。正在实现被归类为对手的行为，以便提供对象和空间的适应性，以使用不同的手段改变生活条件。这些逆境触及部分由城市博物士提供，部分受专业人员通过对建筑窒息的城市地区的干预措施引起对问题的关注。通过对现有情况的立场，目的是以不同的方式对待空间，而不是系统产生的，重新产生它并使其更加民主。所有这样的替代空间情况表明，除了由主要的市场条件定义的情况之外，其他生产方法和思想也是可能的。通过这些反对派的举措，它已被声明，需要在建筑师和规划人员的设计行为期间对用户的每日和更改受试者的需求进行微观设计。出于这个原因，设计师播放的部分应该被忽略“定义”和“控制”效果，并且应该转向使用社会的变革能力，以获得相同的利益，引导用户并提供替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号