【24h】

THEORY VALIDATION -- 2 POINTS OF VIEW

机译:理论验证 - 2个观点

获取原文

摘要

The task of validating any given theory against any given proprotor/propeller data set is of immense importance. Not just to the researchers who are developing a theory, but to the working engineers using the theory to design a proprotor/propeller. However, there is a major difference in how the two groups see validation. This difference is that, most frequently, researchers see the validation in coefficient form as, for example, C_P versus C_T or Figure of Merit versus C_T. In contrast, design engineers much prefer working in the dimensional world as, for example, horsepower required to hover versus aircraft weight. The objective of the design engineer is, of course, to release drawings and specifications to manufacturing so a VTOL aircraft will be built with reasonably high assurance that the aircraft will meet the primary specifications.
机译:验证任何给定的Proprotor / Propeller数据集的任何给定理论的任务都具有巨大的重要性。不仅仅是正在开发理论的研究人员,而是使用该理论设计螺旋桨/螺旋桨的工作工程师。但是,两组如何看到验证有一个主要差异。这种差异是,最常见的是,研究人员认为系数形式的验证为例,例如C_P与C_T或Merit的数字而不是C_T。相比之下,设计工程师更喜欢在尺寸世界中工作,例如,悬停与飞机重量所需的马力。当然,设计工程师的目的是释放制造的图纸和规范,因此VTOL飞机将采用相当高的保证,飞机将符合主要规格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号