首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Religion and Public Civilization >Is There a Just Conflict? Analyzing Pastors' Understanding of Religious-based Conflict from the Just War Perspective
【24h】

Is There a Just Conflict? Analyzing Pastors' Understanding of Religious-based Conflict from the Just War Perspective

机译:有一个只是冲突吗?从Just War Perspective分析牧师对宗教冲突的认识

获取原文

摘要

This research explores pastors' understanding of the 1999-2004 conflict in Ambon based on "just war" principles. The research employs a Just War Theory to survey the perceptions of an interreligious based conflict. The theory claims that a war could be a just war if it meets the principles in the Just War Theory. This research uses the stories from pastors to analyze and criticize the principles. It employed a qualitative method to collect data from field and documentary research. Using a snowball data collection approach, 15 pastors were interviewed in Ambon who experienced the conflict directly with their congregation members. The results show that the conflict in Ambon was not a just war because of the different causes and processes between the conflict in Ambon and the principles of a just war. Moreover, the understanding and experiences of the pastors fundamentally reflect that the just war principles are ideal in theory, but it is extremely hard to make a conflict a just war in practice. Although the conflict engaged religious communities, the principles of a just war still did not exist in the real conflict.
机译:本研究探讨了牧师对1999 - 2004年在大农的冲突的理解,基于“只是战争”原则。该研究采用了一个只是战争理论,调查了基于互感的冲突的看法。该理论声称,如果符合BESE WAR理论的原则,战争可能是一场战争。本研究使用牧师的故事来分析和批评原则。它采用了一种定性方法来收集现场和纪录研究的数据。使用雪球数据收集方法,在Ambon中采访了15名牧师,他们直接与他们的会众成员进行冲突。结果表明,阿姆汶的冲突不是一场正常的战争,因为阿姆尔的冲突与刚战的原则之间的不同原因和过程。此外,牧师的理解和经验从根本上反映出,只有战争原则在理论上是理想的,但在实践中正常发生冲突是非常困难的。虽然冲突从事宗教社区,但实际战争的原则仍然不存在于真正的冲突中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号