• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>German Association of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology., Annual Meeting >How to Access Personal Health Records? Measuring the Intention to Use and the Perceived Usefulness of Two Different Technologies: A Randomised Controlled Study
【24h】

How to Access Personal Health Records? Measuring the Intention to Use and the Perceived Usefulness of Two Different Technologies: A Randomised Controlled Study

机译：如何访问个人健康记录？ 测量使用的意图和两个不同技术的感知有用性：随机对照研究

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Personal health records (PHR) are instruments to compile, store and present health and wellness related data digitally with proven effects on self-management of diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in the intention to use (ITU) and perceived usefulness (PU) of two technologies allowing users to access the PHR, i.e. a kiosk system and a smart phone based app (access as usual). The study also aimed at modelling ITU and PU with multiple linear regressions. A total of 46 subject participated in the study who were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (nkiosk = 22; napp = 24). The task for both groups was to digitise their “Medikationsplan” (medical record) and upload it to the PHR. There was no significant difference in ITU and PU between the two technologies. ITU could only be significantly explained by PU (R2 = .55, p < 0.001), while PU was determined by perceived ease of use and psychological factors (R2 = .64, p < 0.001). Severity of disease did not play any significant role. The German “Terminservice- und Versorgungsgesetz” underpins the importance and timeliness of this study. The assumption that both – the publicly accessible kiosk and the app – are equally acceptable for people of different gender, age and technology background demonstrates the opportunity to master a potential digital divide among the population and allows users to get access to their PHR in multiple ways.
机译：个人健康记录（PHR）是编译，储存和呈现健康和健康相关数据的工具，以证明对疾病的自我管理影响。本研究的目的是调查使用的意图（ITU）和两个技术的有用性（PU）是否存在差异，允许用户访问PHR，即售货亭系统和基于智能电话的应用程序（像往常一样访问）。该研究还旨在使用多元线性回归来建模ITU和PU。共有46个主题参加了随机分配给两个实验组中的一个（NKIOSK = 22; NAPP = 24）的研究。两组的任务是将其“MedikationsPlan”（医疗记录）数字化并将其上传到PHR。两种技术之间的ITU和PU没有显着差异。 ITU只能得到PU（R2 = .55，P <0.001）的显着解释，而PU是通过感知的使用和心理因子来确定的（R2 = .64，P <0.001）。疾病的严重程度没有发挥任何重要作用。德国“Terminservice-und Versorgungsgesetz”为本研究的重要性和及时性。对公开访问的售货亭和应用程序的假设是对不同性别，年龄和技术背景的人同样可以接受，表明有机会掌握人口中的潜在数字鸿沟，并允许用户以多种方式获得他们的PHR 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号