【24h】

Varieties of Enactivism: A Conceptual Geography

机译:品种拟化:概念地理

获取原文

摘要

Enactivism is a non-mainstream approach to cognition that, in its best established guise, rejects internal representation and proposes instead that autonomous living organisms bring forth meaning through a process of bodily coupling with their environments. The approach originates with Varela, Thompson and Rosch's (1991) book The Embodied Mind and has roots in earlier work on phenomenology and the biological phenomenon of autopoiesis. From these origins, the canonical position has been developed and enriched in various ways by Varela, Di Paolo, Thompson and others. All give autopoiesis a central explanatory role. In recent years, the "enactivism" label has been applied more widely to include accounts that ignore or downplay autopoiesis. Enactivism, on a more liberal construal, shares at a minimum the original theory's emphasis on environmentally-situated bodily coupling and argues that the theoretical role played by internal representation should be restricted or eliminated entirely. One account in this broader category is the enactive or sensorimotor approach to perception, which was given perhaps its canonical statement by O'Regan and Noe (2001) and encompasses important work by Hurley (1998). More recently, Hutto and Myin (2013) have offered the first book-length statement of an approach to cognition they call radical enactivism.
机译:“审名”是一种非主流方法,即认知,在其最佳建立的幌子中,拒绝内部代表性,而是通过与其环境的身体耦合过程来提出自主生物体。该方法起源于瓦雷拉,汤普森和Rosch(1991)书中的体现,并在早期的现象学和自身溢出的生物现象上有了根源。从这些起源中,通过瓦雷拉,di paolo,汤普森和其他人以各种方式开发和富集了规范位置。所有人都给Autopoiesis一个中央解释作用。近年来,“章动度”标签已更广泛地应用于忽视或卸下自动涂层的账户。在更自由的建设中,审判在最低原始理论的重点是对环境的身体耦合的重点,并认为内部代表所扮演的理论作用应该完全受到限制或淘汰。这个更广泛的类别中的一个账户是对感知的服务或传感器方法,这是由O'Regan和Noe(2001年)的规范声明,并通过Hurley(1998)涵盖了重要工作。最近,Hutto和Myin(2013年)已经提供了第一批关于认知的方法的陈述声明,他们称之为激进的审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号