• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Volga Region Conference on Economics, Humanities and Sports >Death Donation: The Position of Higher Courts on the Examples of Cases Against Latvia and Russia
【24h】

Death Donation: The Position of Higher Courts on the Examples of Cases Against Latvia and Russia

机译：死亡捐赠：高等法院对拉脱维亚和俄罗斯案例的职位

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The author analyzed the decisions of European Court of Human Rights and Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, made according to the cases, connected with a person's organs and tissues donorship after death for their transplantation in order to define key, not regulated by the authority questions. In all cases state authorities-defendants stated that an intrusion upon applicants' privacy in terms of organs or tissues seizure from the bodies of their relatives after death without their direct consent, given while relatives were alive, or prior informed consent of the applicants, correspond with the criterion, which is defined in item 2 of article 81 in Convention for the Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Protection. The plot of the claims, presented for consideration at European Court of Human Rights according to the discussed decisions, have much in common. In all cases state authorities-defendants stated that an intrusion upon applicants' privacy in terms of organs or tissues seizure from the bodies of their relatives after death without their direct consent, given while relatives were alive, or prior informed consent of the applicants, correspond with the criterion, which is defined in item 2 of article 81 in Convention for the Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Protection. Having analyzed the materials of the cases and the decisions made by the courts, the author outlined the key problems legislative of these issues regulation.
机译：提交人分析了欧洲人权法院的决定，俄罗斯联邦的俄罗斯联邦宪法法院，与一个人的器官和组织捐赠在死后与移植之后的案件联系在一起，以定义关键，而不是由权威问题监管。在所有情况下，国家当局 - 被告指出，在没有直接同意的情况下，在死亡之后，申请人的隐私对申请人的隐私，而在没有直接同意的情况下，在亲属还是申请人的事先知情同意，对应于凭借标准，该标准在第81条第81项中定义的权利和基本自由保护。根据讨论的决定，提出审议欧洲人权法院的索赔情节有很大的共同之处。在所有情况下，国家当局 - 被告指出，在没有直接同意的情况下，在死亡之后，申请人的隐私对申请人的隐私，而在没有直接同意的情况下，在亲属还是申请人的事先知情同意，对应于凭借标准，该标准在第81条第81项中定义的权利和基本自由保护。分析了案件的材料和法院所作的决定，提交人概述了这些问题规定立法的关键问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号