首页> 外文会议>IISL Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space;International Astronautical Congress >SCOPING NATIONAL SPACE LAW: THE TRUE MEANING OF 'NATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN OUTER SPACE' OF ARTICLE VI OF THE OUTER SPACE TREATY
【24h】

SCOPING NATIONAL SPACE LAW: THE TRUE MEANING OF 'NATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN OUTER SPACE' OF ARTICLE VI OF THE OUTER SPACE TREATY

机译:范围国家空间法:外层空间条约第六条“外层空间国家活动”的真正含义

获取原文

摘要

Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty, requiring "authorization and continuing supervision" of "national activities in outer space" including those of "nongovernmental entities", has always been viewed as the primary international obligation driving the establishment of national space legislation for the purpose of addressing private sector space activities. As the Article itself did not provide any further guidance on precisely what categories of 'national activities by nongovernmental entities' should thus be subjected to national space law and in particular to a national licensing regime, in academia generally three different interpretations soon came to be put forward on how to interpret the key notion of 'national' in this context as scoping such national regimes. Looking back at 50 years of national space legislation addressing private sector space activities, however, we now have the possibility to look not only at the writings of learned experts, at best a subsidiary source of public international law, but at actual State practice-cum-opinio iuris on the matter. The present paper, on the basis of a survey of more than two dozen existing national space laws, will therefore be able to considerably narrow the appropriate interpretation of 'national activities in outer space', so as to diminish the uncertainty as regards what categories of private space activities States may be held responsible for, thus both narrowing the permissible discretion of individual States in scoping their national space law regimes and increasing the coherence and transparency of space law at the international level.
机译:“外层空间条约”第六条,需要“外层空间的国家活动”,包括“非政府实体”,一直被视为推动为宗旨建立国家空间立法的主要国际义务解决私营部门的空间活动。由于文章本身并没有就恰恰提供任何进一步的指导,因此应该在国家空间法遵守国家空间法,特别是国家许可制度,在学术界,一般来说三种不同的解释是为了提出关于如何将本文中“国家”的关键概念解释为裁定此类国家制度。回顾50年的国家空间立法,解决了私营部门的空间活动,但我们现在有可能看起来不仅看起来是最佳的公共国际法的子公司的作品,而且在实际的国家实践 - 暨-opinio iuris就此问题。本文根据一项多次现有国家空间法的调查,将能够大大缩小对外层空间的国家活动的适当解释,从而削弱不确定性,以方面的不确定性私人空间活动国家可能持有责任,因此缩小个体国家在国家空间法规方面的允许自行决定,并增加了国际一级空间法的一致性和透明度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号