• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Organizational transformation: opportunities and challenges >TEAMS IN ACTION YEAR SIX: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OFINTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAMS WITH RESPECT TO THE TEAMTHEORY OF LARSON AND LAFASTO
【24h】

TEAMS IN ACTION YEAR SIX: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OFINTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAMS WITH RESPECT TO THE TEAMTHEORY OF LARSON AND LAFASTO

机译：行动六年中的团队：关​​于Larson和Lafasto团队的综合产品团队的定量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Organizations have increased the use of teams in recentrnyears and as such, interest in the teaming process hasrngained momentum. This paper will report on thernassessment of observational data from four seniorrnmechanical design teams working as IntegratedrnProduct Teams (IPTs) with respect to the eight teamingrnprinciples of Larson and LaFasto (1989). Analysis ofrnthis data allowed the observers to rank the IPTs withrnrespect to team progress and predict which IPT wouldrnwin the competition based solely on positive teamingrnattributes. By comparison, a separate panel ofrnaerospace experts, acting as customers for the classrnproject, determined the winning proposal, based on therntechnical merits of the team design proposals. Thernobservers selected IPT A as the winner based on thernobservational data. The independent panel selected IPTrnD as the winner of the design competition.rnRecommendations for study improvements andrnapplication by engineering managers have been madernbased on the conclusions of the study.
机译：近年来，组织增加了对团队的使用，因此，人们对团队合作的兴趣逐渐增强。本文将报告四个作为集成产品团队（IPT）的高级机械设计团队对与Larson和LaFasto（1989）的八个合作原理有关的观测数据的评估。通过对这些数据的分析，观察者可以根据团队进展对IPT进行排名，并仅基于积极的团队合作属性预测哪个IPT会赢得比赛。相比之下，作为班级项目的客户，由航空航天专家组成的单独小组根据团队设计方案的技术优势确定了获胜方案。 Thernobservers根据Thernobservational数据选择IPT A作为赢家。独立小组选择IPTrnD作为设计竞赛的获胜者。在研究结论的基础上，提出了对工程管理人员进行研究改进和应用的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号