Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies

机译：评估协作脚本作为团体指导工具在教育机器人活动中的作用：来自三个案例研究的结论

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Although educational robotics (ER) is considered an innovative and engaging technology for teaching and learning, certain studies emphasize the lack of a coherent and well elaborated pedagogical framework for its implementation. This work contributes toward the development of such a framework by presenting evidence from three case studies implementing ER activities in the school context. The objective has been to explore the impact of various collaboration scripts when used as tools to guide students¢ groupwork during the ER activity. ER activities have been conducted in three secondary education schools (one lower and two higher) employing the TAPPS, Jigsaw and "Send a problem" collaboration techniques and assigning specific roles to students. Key results (based on observation, students¢ questionnaire and interviews) include the following: (a) combining the Jigsaw and "Send a problem" scripts had the greatest impact on increasing students¢ interest and active participation; (b) students¢ subjective impression of improved learning was generated by structured collaboration, (c) students reported improved understanding of programming structures already known from other contexts, (d) the motive "help my group learn based on my expertise" was rated higher by students. Overall, this study presents and discusses field evidence that contribute to an improved pedagogical framework of in-school ER activities.

机译：尽管教育机器人技术（ER）被认为是一种创新的，引人入胜的教学技术，但某些研究强调缺乏一个连贯且精心设计的教学框架来实施。这项工作通过提供来自三个案例研究的证据来为这种框架的发展做出贡献，这些案例研究在学校中实施了ER活动。目的是探索各种协作脚本在ER活动期间用作指导学生小组合作的工具时的影响。已在三所中等教育学校（低一高两高）中开展了ER活动，他们采用了TAPPS，拼图和“发送问题”协作技术，并为学生分配了特定的角色。主要结果（基于观察，学生的问卷调查和访谈）包括：（a）组合拼图和“发送问题”脚本对提高学生的兴趣和积极参与产生最大的影响；（b）学生的主观印象是通过结构化的协作产生的，（c）学生报告说他们对从其他情况中已经知道的编程结构有了更好的理解，（d）动机“帮助我的小组基于我的专业知识”被评为更高由学生。总体而言，本研究提出并讨论了有助于改进学校内部ER活动教学框架的实地证据。

著录项

来源
《Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies》|2012年|p.298- 302|共5页
会议地点 Rome(IT)
作者
Atmatzidou Soumela; Demetriadis Stavros N.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类计算技术、计算机技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Evaluation of a Robotic Assistance-System For Percutaneous Computed Tomography-Guided (CT-Guided) Facet Joint Injection: A Phantom Study [J] . Lukas Philipp Beyer, Katharina Michalik, Christoph Niessen, Medical science monitor : . 2016,第7期

机译：经皮计算机断层扫描引导（CT引导）小平面关节注射机器人辅助系统的评估：幻像研究
2. An educational tool to improve patient perceptions on the roles of an anesthesiologist and the importance of pre-anesthetic evaluation: A quality initiative study [J] . Smitha Elizabeth George, Grace Rebekah, Anita Shirley Joselyn The Indian Anaesthetists Forum . 2020,第2期

机译：一种教育工具，以提高对麻醉师角色的患者的看法以及审美预审评估的重要性：优质倡议研究
3. Collaboration of human pickers and crop-transporting robots during harvesting - Part II: Simulator evaluation and robot-scheduling case-study [J] . Computers and Electronics in Agriculture . 2020,第期

机译：收获过程中的人类拾取器和作物运输机器人的合作 - 第二部分：模拟器评估和机器人调度案例研究
4. Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies [C] . Atmatzidou Soumela, Demetriadis Stavros N. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies . 2012

机译：评估协作脚本作为教育机器人活动活动中的群体指导工具的作用：三种案例研究的结论
5. A graphical robot activity scripting platform (GRASP) for ActivMedia robots. [D] . Cruickshanks, James Robert, III. 2004

机译：用于ActivMedia机器人的图形化机器人活动脚本平台（GRASP）。
6. Randomized Crossover Study to Evaluate Access to On-line Clinical Practice Guidelines Published on the World Wide Web as an Educational Tool [O] . Yaariv Khaykin, Suma Prakash, Maria Bacchus 2000

机译：随机交叉研究以评估对在线临床实践指南的访问该指南作为教育工具在万维网上发布
7. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure) developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation endorsed by the heart failure society of america51The document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in November 2001 and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in September 2001.52When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101–13.53The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.54This document, as well as the corresponding full-text guidelines, is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). Single reprints of the executive summary are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To purchase additional reprints up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org (specify version: Executive Summary—71-0125; Full Text—71-1026).55© 2001 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Hunt Sharon A, Baker David W, Chin Marshall H, 2001

机译：ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会修订1995年心脏评估和管理指南与美国心力衰竭学会认可的国际心脏和肺移植协会合作51）该文件于2001年11月获得美国心脏病学会理事会的批准，并于2001年9月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准.52引用本文件时，美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Hunt SA，Baker DW，Chin MH，Cinquegrani MP，Feldman AM，Francis GS，Ganiats TG，Goldstein S，Gregoratos G，Jessup ML，Noble RJ，Packer M，Silver MA，Stevenson LW。 ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（修订1995年《美国心脏病学会评估和管理指南》的委员会心脏衰竭）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38：2101–13.53美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会竭尽全力避免由于外部关系或个人，专业或其他原因而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。写作小组成员的商业利益。具体而言，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审查，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。54本文档以及相应的全文指南可在万维网上找到。美国心脏病学院（www.acc.org）和美国心脏协会（www.americanheart.org）的网站。致电800-253-4636（仅适用于美国）或写信给美国心脏病，教育服务学院，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，可以执行摘要的单个重印本，每张5.00美元。要购买最多999份的其他重印本，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671； 1000或更多副本，请致电214-706-1466，传真214-691-6342或电子邮件pubauth@heart.org（指定版本：执行摘要-71-0125；全文-71-1026）。55©2001美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会有限公司

Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅