【24h】

When is a RIK not a RIK?

机译:什么时候风险不是风险?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Replacements in Kind (RIKs) generally receive less rigorous treatment in the change management process, because they are assumed to present little or no process risk. This paper describes a change to a control valve actuator, classified as a RIK. This change, which did not involve penetration of the primary process containment boundary, nonetheless led to a significant loss of containment event.rnThe investigative steps to identify the failure mechanism will be discussed, as well as modifications made to the MOC system to better classify and capture such "non-change changes."
机译:实物替换(RIK)通常在变更管理过程中受到的严格程度较低,因为它们被认为几乎没有流程风险。本文介绍了对控制阀执行器的更改,分类为RIK。这种变化并未涉及到主要过程安全壳边界的渗透,但仍然导致了严重的安全壳事件损失。将讨论确定失效机制的调查步骤,以及对MOC系统进行的修改,以更好地分类和分类。捕获这种“不变的变化”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号