首页> 外文会议>Workshop on re-architecting the internet 2010 >Application Neutrality and a Paradox of Side Payments
【24h】

Application Neutrality and a Paradox of Side Payments

机译:应用程序中立性和附带付款的悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The ongoing debate over net neutrality covers a broad set of issues related to the regulation of public networks. In two ways, we extend an idealized usage-priced game-theoretic framework based on a common linear demand-response model [ 1 ]. First, we study the impact of "side payments" among a plurality of Internet service (access) providers and content providers. In the non-monopolistic case, our analysis reveals an interesting "paradox" of side payments in that overall revenues are reduced for those that receive them. Second, assuming different application types (e.g., HTTP web traf-fc, peer-to-peer fie sharing, media streaming, interactive VoIP), we extend this model to accommodate differential pricing among them in order to study the issue of application neutrality. Revenues for neutral and non-neutral pricing are compared for the case of two application types.
机译:正在进行的有关网络中立性的辩论涉及与公共网络监管相关的广泛问题。在两种方式下,我们基于常见的线性需求响应模型[1]扩展了理想的使用定价游戏理论框架。首先,我们研究了“边际付款”对多个互联网服务(访问)提供商和内容提供商的影响。在非垄断的情况下,我们的分析揭示了附带支付的一个有趣的“悖论”,因为接受这些支付的总收入减少了。其次,假设使用不同的应用程序类型(例如HTTP Web traf-fc,对等fie共享,媒体流,交互式VoIP),我们将扩展该模型以适应其中的不同定价,以研究应用程序中立性问题。对于两种应用程序类型,比较中性和非中性定价的收入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号