文摘
英文文摘
Acknowledgements
CHAPTER1INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
2.1 A brief literature review
2.2 Critical Discourse Analysis
2.2.1 Eight principles of CDA
2.2.2 Fairclough's three-dimensional model for CDA
2.2.3 The methodology and procedures of CDA
2.3 SFL and CDA
2.3.1 The relationship between CDA and SFL
2.3.2 Modality in Halliday's Functional Grammar
2.3.3 Increasing delicacy
2.3.4 Palmer's Modality System
CHAPTER 3 FAIRCLOUGH'S THREE-DIMENSIONAL FRAMEWORK UESD IN ANALYZING THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
3.1 The division of the debate
3.2 The three dimensions of the debate
3.2.1 Social Practice
3.2.2 Discourse Practice
3.2.3 Text analysis: combining SFL with CDA
CHAPTER 4 HALLIDAY'S MODALITY SYSTEM USED IN ANALYZING THE DEBATE
4.1 Interpersonal functions of Modality
4.2 Modality in the presidential debate
4.2.1 To provide necessary and favorable information
4.2.2 To prompt action on the part of the public
4.3 The analysis of modal metaphors
CHAPTER 5 THE DELICATE ANALYSIS OF MODAL VERBS
5.1 Brief introduction
5.2 The delicate analysis of modal verbs in the debate
5.2.1 The CDA of the debate concerning terrorism
5.2.2 The CDA of the debate concerning Iraq problem
5.2.3The CDA of the debate concerning North Korean and Iranian problems
CHAPTER 6 THE ANALYSIS OF OTHER ASPECTS OF MODALITY IN THE DEBATE
6.1 The analysis of the choice of pronouns
6.2 The choice of content verbs
6.3 The choice of tense
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
研究生学习期间公开发表的论文
