首页> 外文学位 >Putting statesmanship back into statecraft: The role of transformative ambition in international relations.
【24h】

Putting statesmanship back into statecraft: The role of transformative ambition in international relations.

机译:重新将政治风尚纳入治国之道:变革性雄心在国际关系中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, I explore how changes in foreign policies are in large part a result of the political ambition of national leaders. I critically examine how prevailing theories in international relations conceive of leadership. Specifically, I reevaluate the role of political ambition in international-relations and foreign-policy theories. Neorealism couples leaders' ambition to the state's imperative to survive in the anarchic international system; leaders display either restrained (security maximizing) or unlimited (power maximizing) ambition. Institutional theories of strategic interaction focus on leaders in domestic arenas but narrowly focus on their ambition for political office. Personality theories rightly assume that leaders' motivations vary, yet these are seen as the product of idiosyncrasies; they mistakenly reduce the ambition for power and achievement to unconscious drives and character defects. I investigate leaders who have greater and a qualitatively different kind of ambition than is ordinarily recognized in political science. I carve out a sphere of autonomy for statesmen by introducing the notion that leaders with transformative ambition not only rise above constraints but also change the rules of the game. Such high acts of statesmanship depend on the redefinition of ordinary political ambition into great ambition, which is something leaders are self-aware of. Drawing on Aristotle's idea of magnanimity and Niccolo Machiavelli's lessons to princes through his examples of great founders, I distinguish between ordinary and great ambition. The latter is usually a precondition for transformative ambition, which leads an individual to challenge the rules of the day and can be revolutionary as leaders seek to make their marks on the world. As such, these leaders' foreign policy is not defined by the structure of international relations, but by their view of what can be accomplished through international politics. They are not blind to constraints, but use state capabilities and the art of statesmanship to push others to accept their worldviews. Through the force of their initiative, personalities, and the practice of statesmanship, leaders with transformative ambition try to accomplish great goals despite international and domestic constraints. Successful leaders manage to change the conventions and rules of international politics and (re)set the relations between states. In support of this argument, I examine various cases studies, including Otto Von Bismarck, Woodrow Wilson, Charles de Gaulle, and Pericles.
机译:在这篇论文中,我探讨了外交政策的变化在很大程度上是国家领导人的政治野心的结果。我批判性地研究了国际关系中的主流理论如何理解领导力。具体来说,我重新评估了政治抱负在国际关系和外交政策理论中的作用。新现实主义将领导人的野心与国家在无政府状态的国际体系中生存的必要性结合在一起;领导者要么表现出克制(最大化的安全性),要么表现出无限的(最大化功率的)野心。战略互动的制度理论侧重于国内领域的领导人,但狭narrow地侧重于他们的政治职务抱负。人格理论正确地假设领导者的动机各不相同,但这些动机被视为特质的产物。他们错误地将权力和成就的野心降低到潜意识驱动和性格缺陷上。我调查的野心比政治科学中普遍认可的野心更大,而且在质上也有所不同。我通过引入这样一种观念开辟了政治家自治的空间,即具有变革野心的领导人不仅超越约束,而且改变游戏规则。如此高尚的政治家行为取决于将普通的政治野心重新定义为雄心勃勃的野心,这是领导人意识到的。借鉴亚里士多德的宽宏大量思想,以及尼古洛·马基雅维利(Niccolo Machiavelli)通过其伟大创始人的榜样向王子们上课,我区分了野心和野心。后者通常是变革野心的前提,这会导致个人挑战当今的规则,并且在领导人寻求在世界上留下自己的烙印时可以是革命性的。因此,这些领导人的外交政策不是由国际关系的结构来定义的,而是由他们对通过国际政治可以实现的目标的看法来定义的。他们不是不受束缚的盲目,而是利用国家能力和政治风气来推动他人接受他们的世界观。面对国际和国内的限制,具有变革野心的领导人通过他们的主动性,个性和政治风尚的力量,力图实现伟大的目标。成功的领导人设法改变国际政治的惯例和规则,并(重新)设定国家之间的关系。为了支持这种观点,我研究了各种案例研究,包括奥托·冯·Bi斯麦,伍德罗·威尔逊,查尔斯·戴高乐和珀里克利斯。

著录项

  • 作者

    Menaldo, Mark Antonio.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 223 p.
  • 总页数 223
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号