• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Best practices for academic program review in large post-secondary institutions: A modified Delphi approach.
【24h】

Best practices for academic program review in large post-secondary institutions: A modified Delphi approach.

机译：大型高等院校学术课程审查的最佳实践：一种改进的Delphi方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Accountability in higher education is a focus for accrediting agencies and the Department of Education. There is a call for colleges and universities to evaluate the quality of academic degree programs in an effort to demonstrate transparency and accountability relative to institutional effectiveness, students learning and success, and employment preparation. One way to do this is through the academic program review process. A review of the literature has shown there is no clear consensus in the field, industry, or among experts about the fundamental elements of an academic program review. The purpose of this study was to gain consensus among academic program review experts in an effort to inform best practice for academic program review in post-secondary colleges and universities. A three-round modified Delphi approach was used in the study to elicit input from 21 academic program review experts. The study resulted in four themes broken into six specific recommendations on the purpose of a program review and the best location to house the process to be most effective, 11 recommendations on what to include in an academic program review, three recommendations about how best to use the results, and five recommendations for what success may look like for an academic program review. These 25 recommendations are very specific, which provides a baseline for how colleges and universities may approach the academic program review process. This study lays the foundation for further research on the academic program review process.
机译：高等教育问责制是认证机构和教育部的重点工作。呼吁大学评估大学学位课程的质量，以证明与机构效力，学生学习和成功以及就业准备有关的透明性和责任感。一种方法是通过学术课程审查过程。文献回顾表明，在学术领域，学术界，学术界或学术界，对于学术课程审查的基本要素尚无明确共识。这项研究的目的是在学术课程审查专家之间达成共识，以期为高等院校的学术课程审查提供最佳实践。在研究中使用了三轮改进的Delphi方法，以征询21位学术计划评审专家的意见。该研究将四个主题分为六个主题，分别是针对计划评审的目的和针对最佳方案的最佳位置，以确保最有效的流程；针对学术计划评审内容的11项建议；关于最佳使用方法的三项建议结果，以及对学术课程审查可能会取得什么样成功的五点建议。这25条建议非常具体，为高校如何进行学术课程审查过程提供了基准。该研究为学术课程审查过程的进一步研究奠定了基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Feikema, Jodi Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of the Rockies.;

  • 授予单位 The University of the Rockies.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Educational evaluation.;Higher education administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 150 p.
  • 总页数 150
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号