首页> 外文学位 >Institutional evaluation in Quebec: An interpretation of organizational response to policy approaches in the context of Marianopolis College.
【24h】

Institutional evaluation in Quebec: An interpretation of organizational response to policy approaches in the context of Marianopolis College.

机译:魁北克的机构评估:在马里亚诺波利斯学院背景下对组织对政策方法的反应的解释。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the past two to three decades there has been tremendously increased interest from various sectors of society in the performance, effectiveness and social responsibility of higher education. As a result, an audit culture has evolved within which quality assurance has become an integral part of the politics of governance which assumes external regulation of academic activity to be the natural state of affairs. In Quebec, the Commission d'Evaluation de L'enseignement Collegial (CEEC) serves government instrumentally by institutionalizing accountability mechanisms, evaluation, and other quality assurance practices as technologies that transmit, as well as shape, particular values within the college-level sector. The underlying rationale for this study is to develop a deeper understanding of the institutional evaluation process. In order to attain this study's research objectives, a multidimensional theoretical framework is employed to analyze and interpret the ways by which the college of interest relates and responds to the institutional environment within which it is embedded. This framework draws upon neo-institutionalism theory in sociology and the emerging body of discourse literature within organizational studies. In answering the research question, a constructivist, qualitative interpretive case study of the college's self-evaluative experience is developed to clarify three specific aspects of the dynamics of quality assurance and the institutional evaluation process: how national policy regimes and organizations within their fields envision and approach quality assurance; which particular organizational strategies and procedures are adopted to achieve specific quality objectives in response to the organization's mission, vision and the institutional environment; and, how organizational interests are served in the process of implementing and complying with regulatory quality assurance procedures.; Three substantive findings emerge from this study. Firstly, quality assurance policy in Quebec focuses on strengthening and sustaining the quality and integrity of academic programs and institutional management, and on encouraging and enabling colleges to develop a culture of evaluation. Quebec's quality assurance agency has placed improvement, the enhancement of relevance, effectiveness, quality and accountability in the forefront. Secondly, the College's evaluative discourse claims alignment with institutional and social expectations and the attainment of organizational mission and goals, the primary goal being the successful preparation of students for university studies. In fact, the overarching thesis which emerges from the data is that Marianopolis is characterized by superior institutional and student success. The competencies and capabilities of the College may be attributed to its commitment to academic excellence, as well as to specific strategic decisions and organizational processes that manipulate and convert resources and assets into new value-creating services. Thirdly, the College uses discourse to solidify its identity, and to be self-defined and identified in relation to specific standards and practices in conformity to institutional norms, policy, and social expectations, and to claim legitimacy in light of such alignment.; The propositions that link the patterns, unifying themes and concepts within the data embody a coherent explanation of the organization's response to the management of the educational process in the context of accountability. These propositions have the potential to serve as a basis for transferability from the case of interest to the wider population of colleges. They also suggest avenues for future process-based research on the management and functioning of the colleges, and should inform models for holistic quality development in this regard.
机译:在过去的两到三十年中,社会各界对高等教育的绩效,效力和社会责任有了极大的兴趣。结果,一种审核文化得以发展,在这种文化中,质量保证已成为治理政治的一个组成部分,这种管理假定对学术活动的外部调节是自然的事态。在魁北克,高级评估委员会(CEEC)通过将问责机制,评估和其他质量保证措施制度化,从而在政府层面上传播和塑造特定价值,从而为政府提供了有力的服务。这项研究的基本原理是加深对制度评估过程的理解。为了达到本研究的研究目的,采用多维理论框架来分析和解释感兴趣的学院与之相关的方式并对其所处的制度环境做出反应。该框架借鉴了社会学领域的新制度主义理论和组织研究中新兴的话语文学。在回答研究问题时,针对大学的自我评估经验进行了建构主义的,定性的解释性案例研究,以阐明质量保证动态和制度评估过程的三个具体方面:如何在其领域内制定和制定国家政策体系和组织。接近质量保证;为响应组织的使命,愿景和机构环境,采用了哪些特定的组织策略和程序来实现特定的质量目标;以及在实施和遵守监管质量保证程序的过程中如何维护组织利益。这项研究得出了三个实质性发现。首先,魁北克的质量保证政策的重点是加强和维持学术课程和机构管理的质量和完整性,并鼓励和使大学发展评价文化。魁北克的质量保证机构将改进,相关性,有效性,质量和问责制放在首位。其次,学院的评价性话语要求与机构和社会期望保持一致,并达到组织使命和目标,主要目标是为学生成功地准备大学学习做好准备。实际上,从数据中得出的总体论点是,马里亚诺波利斯的特征是卓越的机构和学生成就。学院的能力和能力可能归因于其对学术卓越的承诺,以及将资源和资产转化为新的价值创造服务的具体战略决策和组织过程。第三,学院使用话语来巩固自己的身份,并根据机构规范,政策和社会期望,根据特定的标准和实践进行自我定义和识别,并根据这种一致性主张合法性。在数据中链接模式,统一主题和概念的命题体现了对组织在问责制背景下对教育过程管理的反应的一致解释。这些主张有可能成为从关注案例到更广泛的大学转移的基础。他们还为将来的基于过程的大学管理和职能研究提供了建议,并应为这方面的整体素质发展提供参考模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brooks, Stanley.;

  • 作者单位

    McGill University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McGill University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Education Community College.; Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 333 p.
  • 总页数 333
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号