首页> 外文学位 >The fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law: The Mexican experience.
【24h】

The fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law: The Mexican experience.

机译:国际投资法中公平公正的待遇标准:墨西哥的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the Mexican experience with respect to the application of one of the most controversial standards in international investment law: the obligation to provide a fair and equitable treatment (FET) to foreign investors. A hypothesis of this paper is that it is not appropriate to define a normative content of the FET standard by only discussing the host country measures taken, allegedly, against a foreign investor. Rather, in the analysis of different cases involving Mexico, the perceived conduct of the foreign investor could be used by the host country as a defense in allegations of FET violations. According with this thesis, this is the only approach that seeks to find a balance between the investors' rights and the legitimate domestic public policies of the host country.; This thesis - after discussing the historical, institutional, and doctrinal framework of the FET standard - analyzes the factual circumstances and legal allegations marshaled by the parties in those cases involving Mexico. In the NAFTA context, this paper highlights the differences in the construction of the FET standard made by the tribunals in the cases resolved before the Free Trade Commission issued the 2001 Notes of Interpretation, and the interpretation in those cases settled after these Notes were issued. Also, there is a remarkable difference in some aspects of the normative content of the standard in the cases settled in the framework of the Bilateral Investment Treaties.; In addition, this thesis concludes that the concept of FET as part of a minimum standard of treatment of customary international law is continuously evolving; that exhaustive jurisprudential analyses demonstrate that is possible to define a normative content of the FET standard. In any event, the threshold for finding a violation of any of the elements of this normative content remains high; and that the lack of an appellate review in investor---State disputes largely contributes to the lack of a clear understanding of the meaning of the FET standard.
机译:本文的目的是分析墨西哥在实施国际投资法中最具争议的标准之一方面的经验:为外国投资者提供公平和公正的待遇(FET)的义务。本文的一个假设是,仅讨论东道国据称针对外国投资者采取的措施来定义FET标准的规范性内容是不合适的。相反,在分析涉及墨西哥的不同案件时,东道国可以将外国投资者的感知行为作为对违反FET指控的辩护。根据本论文,这是寻求在投资者权利与东道国合法国内公共政策之间寻求平衡的唯一方法。在讨论了FET标准的历史,制度和理论框架之后,本论文分析了在涉及墨西哥的案件中当事方整理的事实情况和法律指控。在北美自由贸易协定的背景下,本文重点介绍了在自由贸易委员会发布2001年解释性说明之前解决的案件中,法庭制定的FET标准的差异,以及在这些说明发布后解决的案件中的解释。此外,在双边投资条约框架内解决的案件中,标准规范内容的某些方面也存在显着差异。此外,本文得出的结论是,作为习惯国际法最低处理标准一部分的场效应晶体管概念正在不断发展。详尽的法学分析表明,可以定义FET标准的规范性内容。无论如何,寻找违反该规范内容任何要素的门槛仍然很高;并且,在投资者与国家之间的争端中缺乏上诉审查,这在很大程度上导致人们对FET标准的含义缺乏清晰的了解。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Tulane University.;

  • 授予单位 Tulane University.;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 264 p.
  • 总页数 264
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号