• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Access and control over controversial records.
【24h】

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Access and control over controversial records.

机译：塔斯基吉梅毒研究：对有争议的记录的访问和控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

No doubt throughout all past time there actually occurred a series of events which, whether we know what it was or not, constitutes history in some ultimate sense...The event itself once occurred, but as an actual event it has disappeared; so that in dealing with it the only objective reality we can observe or test is some material trace which the event has left---usually a written document. With these traces of vanished events, these documents, we must be content since they are all we have; from them we infer what the event was, we affirm that it is a fact that the event was so and so. 1; As the nation's archives, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) preserves and provides access to records that document how our government conducts business on behalf of the American people---past and present. For the American citizen, NARA provides a form of accountability through the records within its custody which affect the nation's collective memory. A plethora of these records, however, contain evidence of the federal government's misconduct in episodes in American history which affected public trust. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study records are a prime example of records within the custody of NARA that continue to have a lasting affect on public trust in the federal government. Even though NARA disclosed administrative records that document the government's role in the study, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study records continue to challenge the institution on a variety of archival issues such as access, privacy, collective memory, and accountability. Through historical case study methodology, this study examines the National Archives and Records Administration's administrative role in maintaining and providing access to the Tuskegee Syphilis Study records, especially the restricted information. The effect of the changing social context on NARA's recordkeeping practices of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study records is also explored.; 1Carl Becker, "Everyman His Own Historian," American Historical Review 37 (January 1932): 221.
机译：毫无疑问，在过去的整个过程中，实际上发生了一系列事件，无论我们是否知道它是什么，都构成了某种最终意义上的历史……事件本身曾经发生过，但作为一个实际事件却消失了；因此，在处理该事件时，我们可以观察或检验的唯一客观现实是事件留下的一些实质性痕迹-通常是书面文件。有了这些消失的事件的痕迹和这些文件，我们必须满足，因为它们是我们所拥有的全部；从他们那里我们推断出事件是什么，我们确认事件是某某事实是事实。 1;作为国家档案馆，美国国家档案暨记录管理局（NARA）保留并提供对文件的访问权限，这些文件记录了我们的政府如何代表过去和现在的美国人开展业务。对于美国公民而言，NARA通过其保管范围内影响国家集体记忆的记录提供了一种问责制。然而，大量的这些记录都包含了联邦政府在美国历史上影响公众信任的事件中的不当行为的证据。塔斯基吉梅毒研究记录是NARA保管的记录的一个典型示例，这些记录继续对公众对联邦政府的信任产生持久影响。尽管NARA披露了行政记录以证明政府在研究中的作用，但《梅毒研究》的记录仍在各种档案问题（如访问，隐私，集体记忆和问责制）上挑战该机构。通过历史案例研究方法，本研究考察了国家档案局（National Archives and Records Administration）在维护和提供对Tuskegee Syphilis研究记录（尤其是受限制信息）的访问方面的行政作用。还探讨了不断变化的社会环境对NARA的《 Tuskegee Syphilis研究》记录的记录保存做法的影响。 1卡尔·贝克尔，《每个人都是自己的历史学家》，《美国历史评论》第37期（1932年1月）：221。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号