首页> 外文学位 >Exploring the direct versus indirect linkages among operations practices, operations capabilities and operations performance: Does competitive context moderate the key relationships?
【24h】

Exploring the direct versus indirect linkages among operations practices, operations capabilities and operations performance: Does competitive context moderate the key relationships?

机译:探索运营实践,运营能力和运营绩效之间的直接和间接联系:竞争环境是否会缓和关键关系?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Past research in operations strategy has identified several elements when establishing the linkages between operations decisions and business performance. However, the nature of the relationships among these elements has not been fully understood. This dissertation research focuses on exploring the impact of two inter-related but different elements---operations practice initiatives (i.e., operations practices viewed at the middle level of aggregation) and operations capabilities---on operations performance. The goal is to find out the foci of practice initiatives implementation and operations capabilities development, and the focus of operations strategy under different business environments. The overall objective of this study is accomplished through the exploration of four primary research questions. (1) What are operations practices and operations capabilities? What are the critical differentiators? (2) Are operations practices initiatives compensatory or additive in enhancing operations performance? Are operations capabilities compensatory or additive in enhancing operations performance? (3) What are the relationships between operations practice initiatives, operations capabilities, and operations performance? (4) To what extent are the key relationships among operations practice initiatives, operations capabilities, and operations performance influenced by competitive environment?; This is primarily a theory building research that follows Wacker's (1998) procedure. In stead of separating theory building with theory validation, the study integrated both activities in one cycle. At the first stage, the grounded theory method was used to derive and extract theory from a focus group study. At the end of this stage a tentative model was proposed for validation. The second stage was to collect data from a large professional organization, test the tentative model, and further refine the model based on the feedback of the data.; After analyzing the data, the study came to the following conclusions. First, with refined definitions, operations practice initiatives and operations capabilities can be clearly distinguished from one another and their validities were confirmed. Second, the nature of the intra-relationships among operations practices was quite different from that among operations capabilities. Third, the importance of operations practice initiatives and operations capabilities in improving operations performance depended on the performance goals. Lastly, the findings established the moderating roles of market competitiveness and market dynamism in the relationships among operations practices, operations capabilities, and operations performance.; Overall, the results emphasized the value of cultivating operations capabilities in the process of implementing operations practices initiatives, and the significant influence of the business environment on choosing the focus of operations strategy. In addition, it showed that firms should be more focused on strategic decisions, on what practices initiatives to implement, and on what operations capabilities to develop since they exhibit a more compensatory than additive nature. The research is one of the few to explore these issues. The findings of this study not only enriched theory of operations strategy, but also motivated future research by proposing, testing and refining general hypotheses.
机译:建立运营决策与业务绩效之间的联系时,运营策略的以往研究已经确定了几个要素。但是,这些元素之间的关系的性质尚未完全理解。本论文的研究重点是探讨两个相互关联但又不同的要素-运营实践计划(即,在聚合的中间层查看的运营实践)和运营能力-对运营绩效的影响。目的是找出实践计划实施和运营能力开发的重点,以及不同业务环境下的运营策略重点。本研究的总体目标是通过探索四个主要研究问题来实现的。 (1)什么是运营实践和运营能力?关键的区别是什么? (2)运营实践计划是对提高运营绩效的补充还是补充?运营能力是对运营绩效的补充还是补充? (3)运营实践计划,运营能力和运营绩效之间有什么关系? (4)竞争环境对运营实践计划,运营能力和运营绩效之间的关键关系有多大程度的影响?这主要是遵循Wacker(1998)程序的理论构建研究。该研究不是将理论构建与理论验证分开,而是将两个活动整合为一个周期。在第一阶段,扎根理论方法用于从焦点小组研究中提取理论。在此阶段的最后,提出了一个暂定模型进行验证。第二阶段是从大型专业机构收集数据,测试暂定模型,然后根据数据反馈进一步完善模型。在分析数据之后,研究得出以下结论。首先,通过完善的定义,可以将运营实践计划和运营能力区分开来,并确认其有效性。其次,运营实践之间的内部关系的性质与运营能力之间的内部关系完全不同。第三,运营实践计划和运营能力对提高运营绩效的重要性取决于绩效目标。最后,研究结果确立了市场竞争力和市场活力在运营实践,运营能力和运营绩效之间的关系中的调节作用。总体而言,结果强调了在实施运营实践计划的过程中培养运营能力的价值,以及业务环境对选择运营策略重点的重大影响。此外,它表明企业应该更加关注战略决策,实施哪些实践计划以及发展哪些运营能力,因为它们表现出的是补偿性而非累加性。该研究是探索这些问题的少数研究之一。这项研究的发现不仅丰富了运营策略理论,而且通过提出,检验和完善一般假设激励了未来的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wu, Sarah Jinhui.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Operations Research.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 178 p.
  • 总页数 178
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;运筹学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号