• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Attachment style and masculine norms adherence as mediators of stress and intimate partner violence in association with gender and romantic relationship types.
【24h】

Attachment style and masculine norms adherence as mediators of stress and intimate partner violence in association with gender and romantic relationship types.

机译：依恋风格和男性规范的坚持是与性别和浪漫关系类型相关的压力和亲密伴侣暴力的中介。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study intended to extend research about stress and intimate partner violence (IPV). Several models were used to examine gender and romantic relationship types in associated roles, assessing the contributions of insecure adult attachment styles and masculine norms adherence as mediators. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized to test the validity of the model. Subjects consisted of 106 male and 129 female adults, including 52 Gay men and 55 Lesbian women. Each participant was administered a survey composed of a demographics questionnaire, screening form, Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory, the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, the Family Inventory of Life Events and Changes, the Revised Relationship Scales Questionnaire, and the Perceived Stress Scale. Testing was by retrospective self-report completed online over the course of a multi-month data collection period. Scores were compared between genders and romantic relationship types on stress and IPV using analysis of variance tests with minimal differences. The mediation model and full model for stress and IPV variables with insecure attachment as the mediator were tested for significance of difference between the nested pathways, achieving a significant result indicating the full model fit the data better than the mediation model. The mediation model and full model for stress and IPV variables with adherence to masculine norms as the mediator were tested for significance of difference between the nested pathways, again with a significant result indicating the full model fit the data best. The comparison of the results of this replication to the original study by Craft, Serovich, McKenry, and Lim (2008) revealed no large, significant differences among the two samples. However, the mediation model using insecure attachment did not replicate the Craft et al. study, instead finding stress to be the strongest predictor. Similarly, adherence to masculine norms was not found to be a significant mediator. It is important that research on this topic achieve a larger sample derived from a culturally diverse yet clearly defined geographic population. Following the participants of such a study over a period of time could prove important to understanding the etiology and outcomes of couples IPV.
机译：这项研究旨在扩展有关压力和亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）的研究。几种模型被用来检验相关角色中的性别和浪漫关系类型，评估不安全的成人依恋风格和男性规范依从性作为中介的作用。使用结构方程模型（SEM）来测试模型的有效性。受试者包括106位男性和129位女性成年人，其中包括52位男同性恋者和55位女同性恋者。每位参与者都接受了一项调查，包括人口统计学问卷，筛查表，符合男性规范量表，修订后的冲突策略量表，生活事件和变化的家庭量表，修订后的关系量表问卷和感知压力量表。通过历时数月的数据收集，在网上完成回顾性自我报告来完成测试。使用差异最小的方差分析分析比较性别和浪漫关系类型在压力和IPV上的得分。测试了以不安全依恋为中介的压力和IPV变量的中介模型和完整模型的嵌套路径之间差异的显着性，取得了显着结果，表明完整模型比中介模型更适合数据。测试了以男性规范为中介的压力和IPV变量的中介模型和完整模型对嵌套路径之间差异的显着性进行了测试，结果再次表明，完整模型最适合数据。将此复制结果与Craft，Serovich，McKenry和Lim（2008）的原始研究结果进行比较后，发现两个样品之间没有较大的显着差异。但是，使用不安全附件的调解模型没有复制Craft等。研究，而不是发现压力是最强的预测因素。同样，坚持男性规范并不是重要的调解人。重要的是，有关该主题的研究应从文化上各异但定义明确的地理人口中获取更大的样本。在一段时间内跟随此类研究的参与者可能被证明对理解夫妻IPV的病因和结果很重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zimmerman, Lance.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University.;
  • 学科 GLBT Studies.;Sociology General.;Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 229 p.
  • 总页数 229
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号