• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Policymaking through participatory processes: The driving role of policy beliefs at the Colorado Basin Water Roundtable.
【24h】

Policymaking through participatory processes: The driving role of policy beliefs at the Colorado Basin Water Roundtable.

机译：通过参与性过程制定政策：科罗拉多盆地水上圆桌会议上政策信念的驱动作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Colorado Basin Roundtable is a participatory policymaking process composed of representatives of water policy and management interests. This thesis argues that the public participation literature has excelled at understanding processes like these, by exploring how individuals should have opportunities to interact and make decisions within these processes. However, this body of theory has stopped short of understanding the role of interests and representation in a participatory process, due to its focus on "public," most broadly defined. Where public participation fails, policy literature can add in its understanding of interests and coalitions; yet, policy theorists are focused on the political context and thus largely ignore the importance of the design of the process. This thesis brings the two bodies of literature together to propose a new model for looking at participatory policymaking processes that includes interests and interest groups. A participatory process can include individuals appointed to the process who represent interests and whose interactions with each other are influenced by their interests, not just the design of the participatory process. To explore these concepts, the study of the Colorado Basin Roundtable collected survey information from 160 respondents, including 46 on the roundtable and outside stakeholders. Questions on beliefs were analyzed using k-means cluster analysis to create the belief coalitions, and the remaining data was used to better understand interactions within the beliefs coalitions and at the roundtable. Membership in belief clusters was found to have a significant relationship to reports of information sharing and trust with other members of the roundtable. However, membership in belief clusters was not found to have a relationship with key demographics often used to select members of a participatory policymaking process, such as age, gender, and organizational affiliation.
机译：科罗拉多盆地圆桌会议是一个参与性决策过程，由水政策和管理利益的代表组成。本论文认为，公众参与文献通过探索个人应如何在这些过程中进行互动和做出决策的能力，在理解此类过程方面表现出色。但是，由于该理论体系关注的是最广泛定义的“公共”，因此缺乏对利益和代表在参与过程中的作用的理解。在公众参与失败的地方，政策文献可以增加对利益和联盟的理解；然而，政策理论家专注于政治背景，因此在很大程度上忽略了流程设计的重要性。本文将这两个文献结合在一起，提出了一个新的模型来研究包括利益和利益集团在内的参与性决策过程。参与过程可以包括被任命为代表利益并且彼此之间的相互作用受其利益影响的个人，而不仅仅是参与过程的设计。为了探讨这些概念，科罗拉多盆地圆桌会议的研究收集了160位受访者的调查信息，其中包括46位圆桌会议和外部利益相关者。使用k均值聚类分析对信念问题进行了分析，以创建信念联盟，其余数据用于更好地理解信念联盟内部和圆桌会议上的互动。人们发现，信仰群体的成员关系与圆桌会议其他成员之间的信息共享和信任报告有重要关系。但是，没有发现信仰群体的成员资格与经常用于选择参与性决策过程成员（例如年龄，性别和组织隶属关系）的主要人口统计因素有关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lynn, Jewlya.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Denver.;
  • 学科 Water Resource Management.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 石油、天然气工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号