• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Nationalism in the market: The Chinese publishing industry and commodification of nationalistic discourses in the 1990s.
【24h】

Nationalism in the market: The Chinese publishing industry and commodification of nationalistic discourses in the 1990s.

机译：市场中的民族主义：1990年代的中国出版业和民族主义话语商品化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this study, I explain the causal relationship between the expansion of the Chinese book market and the popularization of the nationalistic discourses since mid-1990s. By analyzing the motivations and politico-cultural structures given to the book market actors, I argue that various actors in the book industry, especially book dealers (shushang), found both political safety and marketability in nationalistic discourses; and subsequently, the profit-maximizing efforts of the book industry proliferated and radicalized those discourses among the Chinese reading populace. In the process of the analysis, I suggested two frameworks to interpret popular nationalism in East Asia. First, unlike state-centered European/Western nationalism, East Asian nationalisms can be better understood as hegemony that informs both the state and the general populace of the cognitive reality of politics and history. Since nation possesses higher authority than state in the field of ideology, the commodification of nationalism by cultural market in this region cannot be easily checked and balanced by the state's free will. Second, without strong civil society, political discourses in this region are highly susceptible not only to the state but also to the market force, even under an authoritarian regime. By utilizing Appadurai's and Bourdieu's theories, I suggested that political discourses in market society are produced by interactions among state, market and civil society. In case of China, however, the absence of self-sustaining civil society allows burgeoning market force to directly interact with the state. As a result, cultural intellectuals in China have been forced to choose one of two dependency; market dependency or state dependency.
机译：在这项研究中，我解释了自1990年代中期以来中国图书市场的扩张与民族主义话语的普及之间的因果关系。通过分析给予图书市场参与者的动机和政治文化结构，我认为图书行业的各个参与者，特别是图书经销商（书商）在民族主义话语中都发现了政治安全性和可市场性。随后，图书行业的利润最大化努力激增并激化了中国阅读大众中的这些言论。在分析过程中，我提出了两个框架来解释东亚的流行民族主义。首先，与以国家为中心的欧洲/西方民族主义不同，东亚民族主义可以更好地理解为霸权，它使国家和一般民众都了解政治和历史的认知现实。由于国家在意识形态领域比国家具有更高的权威，因此该地区的自由意志无法轻易地制衡和平衡该地区文化市场对民族主义的商品化。第二，在没有强大的民间社会的情况下，该地区的政治话语不仅对国家而且对市场力量都高度敏感，即使在威权统治下也是如此。通过利用阿帕杜赖和布迪厄的理论，我认为市场社会中的政治话语是由国家，市场和公民社会之间的相互作用产生的。但是，在中国，缺乏自我维持的公民社会使迅速发展的市场力量直接与国家互动。结果，中国的文化知识分子被迫选择两种依赖之一。市场依赖或国家依赖。

著录项

  • 作者

    Seo, Jungmin.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号