• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The effect of sex and gender role orientation on attitudes towards individuals with dependent personality disorder.
【24h】

The effect of sex and gender role orientation on attitudes towards individuals with dependent personality disorder.

机译：性别和性别角色取向对依赖人格障碍患者态度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Research suggests that Dependent Personality Disorder (DPD) is associated with a feminine gender role and the female sex. However, little is known about how men who demonstrate DPD are perceived. Research also suggests that attitudes might be affected by the sex and gender role of the participant, with men and individuals who identify with traditional gender roles making harsher judgments of individuals who exhibit behaviors that are not consistent with traditional gender roles. As the categorical diagnosis of personality disorders has been widely criticized and may soon be replaced, the DSM-5 draft describes the symptoms of DPD using three dimensions (i.e., submissiveness, anxiousness, separation insecurity) in hopes of reducing co-morbidity among diagnoses. The purpose of the present study is to examine attitudes towards men and women with DPD, the moderating effects of participant sex and gender role attitudes, and possible differences between the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 draft conceptualizations of DPD.;A sample of 240 undergraduates (99 M, 141 F) from Indiana State University completed the study online. The participants read one of four DPD vignettes (developed following the method adopted by Rienzi et al., 1994), that portrayed a man or woman with DPD as characterized by the DSM-IV-TR or the DSM-5 draft criteria. Participants rated the perceived dysfunction, distress, psychopathology, and impairment of the person in the vignette (using items adopted from Functowicz & Widiger, 1999). They also rated the descriptiveness of the three dimensions of DPD in the DSM-5 for the person in the vignette (using the DSM-5 draft rating scale, APA, 2010) and rated general attitudes towards the person using items from the Rubin (1974) Liking Scale. Finally, participants completed the Social Roles Questionnaire (SRQ; Baber & Tucker, 2006) to examine participants' attitudes toward gender roles.;One-way ANOVAs indicated that female participants were significantly less traditional, less sex-linked, and more gender transcendent than male participants. Multivariate results indicated a significant effect of the covariate (participant's gender role attitudes), but there were no significant effects of participant sex, sex of the person in the vignette, DSM version, or any significant interactions. The univariate analyses indicated significant differences in all dependent variables except for level of psychopathology as a function of a participant's gender role orientation. Participants who had less traditional gender role attitudes rated the individual in the vignette more negatively (i.e., more impairment and distress; higher in dependency and the three traits representing DPD in the DSM-5 draft; lower agreement with the statements from the Liking Scale). Additionally, a significant interaction was found for sex of the person in the vignette and participant sex for ratings of distress and one item from the Liking Scale. Specifically, female participants gave significantly higher ratings of personal distress when the vignette described a man than when it described a woman, whereas men assigned similar ratings to both versions of the DPD case. Similarly, compared to men, women indicated less agreement with the statement that most people would react favorably to the person, and the ratings were lower for the male version than the female version of the vignette, whereas men assigned similar ratings to male and female versions of the case. Finally, the person in the vignette was perceived as heterosexual by most of the participants, regardless of which vignette the participants received.;Overall, the hypotheses were generally not supported. However, the study provided some support for the importance of attitudes toward gender roles in attitudes towards individuals with DPD, although it does not appear that men with DPD are viewed differently than women with the disorder. Methodological limitations, implications of the findings, and directions for future research are discussed.
机译：研究表明，依赖性人格障碍（DPD）与女性的性别角色和女性相关。但是，关于展示DPD的男人是如何感知的知之甚少。研究还表明，态度可能会受到参与者的性别和性别角色的影响，认同传统性别角色的男人和个人会对表现出与传统性别角色不一致的行为的个人做出更严厉的判断。由于对人格障碍的分类诊断已受到广泛批评，并且可能很快将被取代，因此DSM-5草案使用三个维度（即顺从性，焦虑性，分离不安全感）描述了DPD的症状，以期减少诊断之间的合并症。本研究的目的是研究对DPD的男性和女性的态度，参与者性别和性别角色态度的调节作用以及DSM-IV-TR和DSM-5 DPD概念草案之间的可能差异。印第安纳州立大学的240名本科生（99 M，141 F）中的一部分完成了在线研究。参加者阅读了四个DPD渐晕片之一（按照Rienzi等人，1994年采用的方法开发），描绘了DPD的男性或女性，其特征是DSM-IV-TR或DSM-5草案标准。参加者对小插图中人的感觉障碍，痛苦，心理病理和损伤进行了评分（使用Functowicz＆Widiger，1999年采用的项目）。他们还对小插图中的人对DSM-5中DPD的三个维度的描述性进行了评级（使用DSM-5评级表，APA，2010年），并使用Rubin（1974年）中的项目对人的总体态度进行了评级。 ）喜欢量表最后，参与者完成了社会角色问卷（SRQ； Baber＆Tucker，2006），以检验参与者对性别角色的态度。单向方差分析表明，女性参与者比传统参与者具有更少的传统，更少的性别联系和更多的性别超越男性参与者。多变量结果表明协变量（参与者的性别角色态度）有显着影响，但参与者性别，小插图中的人的性别，DSM版本或任何重大交互作用均无显着影响。单变量分析表明，除了因参与者性别角色取向而引起的心理病理学水平外，所有因变量均存在显着差异。传统性别角色态度较差的参与者对小插图中的个人给予了较负面的评价（即，更多的障碍和苦恼；依赖性更高，DSM-5草案中代表DPD的三个特征；与喜好量表的陈述的一致性较低） 。此外，发现小插曲中人的性别与参与者的性别之间存在显着的交互作用，这与痛苦等级和“喜好量表”中的一项有关。具体而言，当小插图描述男人时，女性参与者对个人遇难的评分要比描述女人时高得多，而男性对DPD案件的两个版本都给予相似的评分。同样，与男性相比，女性对大多数人会对该人做出好的反应的表述也不太同意，男性版本的装饰等级低于女性插图的等级，而男性给男性和女性版本的评级相似的情况。最后，无论参与者收到哪个小插图，大多数参与者都将小插图中的人视为异性恋。总体而言，通常不支持该假设。然而，该研究为在对待DPD的个体中对待性别角色的态度的重要性提供了一些支持，尽管看起来DPD的男性与患有DPD的女性的看法似乎并不相同。讨论了方法的局限性，研究结果的含义以及未来研究的方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Slowik, Amanda K.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Psychology General.;Psychology Personality.;Gender Studies.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 99 p.
  • 总页数 99
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号