首页> 外文学位 >Natural disaster preparedness in college students: Implications for institutions of higher learning.
【24h】

Natural disaster preparedness in college students: Implications for institutions of higher learning.

机译:大学生的自然灾害准备:对高等院校的启示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is a growing interest in conducting research at the university level as a means of evaluating the effectiveness of disaster preparedness programs and/or procedures. Additional studies have examined student preparedness, although further research is needed to develop a better understanding of factors related to preparedness. It was hypothesized that students who are older will be more prepared, that students who perceive a natural disaster as more of a threat will be more prepared, and that those who have experienced a natural disaster will be more prepared. The current study also examined whether a student's confidence in university preparedness is related to how concerned they are about a natural disaster occurring and, in turn, if students' concern is related to how prepared they are. Finally, the study aimed to determine whether there are group differences in disaster preparedness considering various student demographic variables, as well as to further explore the relationships between potential disaster preparedness factors. The final sample size was comprised of 806 student participants who were administered an online survey that included questions regarding disaster preparedness and their experiences with disasters. The majority of the sample was female, White/non-Hispanic, freshman, lived off campus, and was an average of 23 years old. Differences in disaster preparedness-related variables were found in gender and the residential status of students. Age was not found to be a significant predictor of preparedness while Total Experience was found to be a significant predictor of both Actual and Perceived Preparedness. Mixed results were found regarding the relationship between perceived threat and preparedness. Post-hoc exploratory analyses suggest that student confidence in UM's ability to prepare for disasters was a significant predictor of Total Concern, that variables measured in the current study were more related to perceived preparedness versus actual preparedness, and that Total Experience remained a significant predictor of both. Primary limitations of the current investigation include the exploratory and cross-sectional nature of the study design. In addition to utilizing alternative methodologies, suggested future research includes incorporating existing theoretical frameworks and elaboration of the assessment of demographic and population characteristics. At a more global level, the findings highlight the necessity for a critical phase of developing a research program to increase disaster preparedness at an academic institution that involves a more broad assessment and evaluation of the proximal environment in relation to natural disaster preparedness. Locally, moving forward, the institution and researchers can use the foundation of knowledge resulting from the current findings to continue to work together to incorporate a strong evidenced-based framework for further research. Specific recommendations for future research and practical applications are provided.
机译:人们越来越希望在大学一级进行研究,以评估备灾计划和/或程序的有效性。尽管还需要进一步的研究以更好地理解与准备相关的因素,但仍需进行其他研究来检查学生的准备情况。据推测,年龄较大的学生会更加准备,将自然灾害视为威胁的学生会更加准备,经历自然灾害的学生会更加准备。当前的研究还检查了学生对大学准备的信心是否与他们对自然灾害的发生有多担心有关,以及反过来,学生的担忧与他们对有无准备有什么关系。最后,该研究旨在确定考虑各种学生人口统计学变量的灾难准备工作是否存在群体差异,并进一步探讨潜在灾难准备因素之间的关系。最终样本数量由806名学生参与者组成,他们被管理了一项在线调查,其中包括有关备灾及其灾难经历的问题。大部分样本是女性,白人/非西班牙裔,新生,居住在校园外,平均年龄为23岁。在性别和学生的居住状况方面发现了与备灾相关的变量的差异。年龄不被认为是准备的重要指标,而总经验却被认为是实际和感知到的准备的重要指标。关于感知到的威胁与准备之间的关系,发现了不同的结果。事后的探索性分析表明,学生对UM备灾能力的信心是总体担忧的重要预测因素,当前研究中测得的变量与感知准备和实际准备之间的关系更大,而总体经验仍然是对总体准备的重要预测都。当前研究的主要局限性包括研究设计的探索性和横断面性质。除了利用替代方法之外,建议的未来研究还包括合并现有的理论框架以及对人口和人口特征进行评估。在更全球化的水平上,研究结果突出表明,必须在关键的阶段制定研究计划,以提高学术机构的防灾能力,这需要对与自然灾害防备有关的近端环境进行更广泛的评估和评估。在本地,向前发展,该机构和研究人员可以利用当前发现的知识基础,继续开展合作,以纳入一个强有力的循证框架进行进一步研究。提供了针对未来研究和实际应用的具体建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tkachuck, Mathew A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Mississippi.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Mississippi.;
  • 学科 Social sciences education.;Community college education.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 89 p.
  • 总页数 89
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号