首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of the academic achievement of Reading Excellence schools and non-Reading Excellence schools.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of the academic achievement of Reading Excellence schools and non-Reading Excellence schools.

机译:阅读卓越学校和非阅读卓越学校的学术成就的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the achievement (reading, language arts, mathematics) of the Reading Excellence Act Program schools' students and Non-Reading Excellence Act Program schools' students to determine if there were significant differences in the academic achievement of the two types of schools.; A combined casual-comparative and quasi-experimental research design methodology was used. The Georgia Criterion-Referenced Competency Test was used to collect data from the two types of schools. The sample for the study consisted of 207 third grade students from the Georgia Reads schools and 109 from the Non-Georgia Reads schools for a total of 316.; The statistical package for the Social Sciences, Version X (SPSS-X) was employed to analyze the data for this study. The Analysis of Covariance, the t-test for Independent Means, The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the Newman-Keuls Multiple Range Test were employed to generate the comparative findings. Significance was established at the .05 level of probability.; The major findings were summarized as follows: (1) The academic performance of the Reading Excellence schools' third grade students were significantly higher than the academic achievement of the Non-Reading Excellence Schools. (2) The Georgia Reads male and female student's mean reading scores were significantly higher than Non-Georgia Reads female and male students. (3) The analysis by gender yielded disparities in that the Non-Georgia Reads females students achieved a higher mean reading score than their female counterparts. (4) The mean mathematics scores for both Georgia Reads female and male Students were more than eleven points higher than the mean scores for the Non-Georgia Reads. (5) There were no statistical differences between the mathematics achievement of Georgia Reads and students and Non-Georgia Reads students based on gender. (6) Economics were not a primary factor blocking the academic achievement of Georgia Reads and Non-Georgia Reads students. (7) The additional funding to Georgia Reads schools increased the available resources for professional development, parent training, and other resources.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较阅读卓越法课程学生和非阅读卓越法课程学生的成绩(阅读,语言艺术,数学),以确定在学习成绩方面是否存在重大差异两种学校。结合使用了休闲对比研究和半实验研究设计方法。佐治亚州标准参考能力测验用于从两种类型的学校收集数据。该研究的样本包括佐治亚州雷德斯学校的207名三年级学生和非佐治亚州雷德斯学校的109名学生,总计316名。社会科学版本X的统计软件包(SPSS-X)用于分析本研究的数据。使用协方差分析,独立均值的t检验,方差分析(ANOVA)和Newman-Keuls多范围检验来产生比较结果。显着性建立在.05概率水平上。主要研究结果归纳如下:(1)阅读优秀学校三年级学生的学习成绩明显高于非阅读优秀学校。 (2)佐治亚州阅读的男女生的平均阅读分数明显高于非佐治亚州阅读的男女生。 (3)按性别进行的分析产生了差异,因为非乔治亚州读书的女学生的平均阅读分数要高于女生。 (4)佐治亚州男女学生的平均数学分数比非佐治亚州学生的平均分数高出11个百分点。 (5)基于性别,佐治亚州雷兹大学和非佐治亚州雷德学生的数学成绩之间没有统计学差异。 (6)经济学并不是阻碍佐治亚州雷德和非佐治亚州雷德学生学习成绩的主要因素。 (7)向佐治亚州雷德斯学校的额外拨款增加了用于职业发展,家长培训和其他资源的可用资源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bell-Smith, Pamela Denise.;

  • 作者单位

    South Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 South Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Education Reading.; Education Mathematics.; Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 104 p.
  • 总页数 104
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;初等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号