首页> 外文学位 >Confronting for the Greater Good: Are Confrontations that Address the Broad Benefits of Prejudice Reduction Taken Seriously?
【24h】

Confronting for the Greater Good: Are Confrontations that Address the Broad Benefits of Prejudice Reduction Taken Seriously?

机译:为更大的利益而战:是否认真对待了解决减少偏见的广泛利益的对抗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines whether confronting prejudice for the greater good—confronting in a way that conveys the benefits of prejudice reduction to groups and institutions other than the targets of prejudice—can help targets of prejudice be taken more seriously by members of the perpetrating group. This dissertation first tested whether targets of prejudice are taken less seriously when they confront than members of the perpetrating group (i.e. allies). Two studies demonstrate that members of the perpetrating group (i.e., men, Whites) take confrontations by targets of prejudice (i.e., women, Blacks) less seriously than confrontations by allies and that these reactions may be explained by a tendency to attribute targets' confrontations to internal causes (i.e., tendencies to overreact). This dissertation next tested whether confronting for the greater good helps targets of prejudice to be taken more seriously when confronting. Four follow-up studies suggested that targets of prejudice were taken just as seriously as allies when confronting for the greater good. However, these latter experiments failed to replicate the effect that targets of prejudice who confront without using the greater good strategy are taken less seriously than allies who engage in the same confrontation. However, a meta-analysis of all studies demonstrated, across studies, confrontations by targets of prejudice were taken less seriously than confrontations by allies, while confrontations for the greater good were taken equally seriously for targets of prejudice and allies. As such, the individual studies in this dissertation may have failed to demonstrate the predicted effects due to a lack of power. This dissertation thus suggests that confronting for the greater good is one strategy that might help targets of prejudice to be taken seriously when they confront, although further research is needed to better understand the boundary conditions of this effect and should explore other strategies prejudice confronters might also use to be taken more seriously.
机译:本论文探讨了以更大的利益来应对偏见-以一种向偏见目标以外的团体和机构传达偏见减少的好处的方式进行对抗-是否可以帮助肇事者更认真地对待偏见目标。本论文首先测试了偏见的目标在面对时是否比犯罪集团的成员(即盟友)对待的重视程度低。两项研究表明,犯罪集团的成员(即男人,白人)对偏见目标(例如妇女,黑人)的对抗不如盟友的对抗那么严重,并且这些反应可能是由于倾向于将目标的对抗归因于归因于内部原因(即反应过度的趋势)。接下来,本论文测试了为了更大的利益而进行的对抗是否有助于在面对时更加重视偏见的目标。四项后续研究表明,在为实现更大利益而战时,与盟国一样,对待偏见的目标也同样重视。然而,这些后来的实验未能重现这样的效果,即不使用更大的好的策略而面对的偏见目标就比参加相同对抗的盟国没有那么认真对待。然而,对所有研究的荟萃分析表明,在所有研究中,偏见目标的对抗不如盟国的对抗那么认真,而对更大利益的对抗同样偏重于偏见和盟友。因此,由于缺乏动力,本文的个别研究可能未能证明预期的效果。因此,本论文表明,为了更大的利益而进行对抗是一种可能有助于偏见目标在面对时认真对待的策略,尽管还需要进一步研究以更好地理解这种影响的边界条件,并应探索其他策略来对付偏见者使用时要更加认真。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drury, Benjamin James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 122 p.
  • 总页数 122
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号