• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Underappreciated resource or inadequate measure? Minority Protection under Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
【24h】

Underappreciated resource or inadequate measure? Minority Protection under Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

机译：资源不足或措施不足？ 《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第二十七条对少数民族的保护。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is a legally binding and justiciable minority protection provision. It stipulates, "In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language." Perhaps due to its negative, weak and qualified terminology, too many legal scholars display a dismissive attitude toward this article suggesting that they deem it to be an inadequate measure of minority protection. This thesis seeks to address the question of whether article 27 is simply another inadequate measure or an underappreciated resource through analyses of four key questions: (i) the scope question, (ii) the definitional question, (iii) the right-bearer question, and, (iv) the obligation question. Article 27's cautious terminology has produced much confusion and controversy, but the United Nations Human Rights Committee's practice has helped clarify many significant points of contention. Despite contestations to the contrary by many States parties, article 27 has a universal scope and applicability with only two minor, but significant, exceptions. The right-holder is a person belonging to a non-majority ethnic, national, indigenous, racial, religious or linguistic community, and she bears and exercises the rights protected by article 27 as an individual, even though she has a right to exercise them in concert with other members of her community. States parties are obligated to ensure that persons belonging to minority communities have these rights. Hence, I suggest that article 27 should be interpreted according to the following formulation: States parties have negative, and possibly also positive, obligations to ensure that persons belonging to non-majority ethnic, national, indigenous, racial, religious or linguistic communities have individual rights to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, and to use their own language, including also the right to exercise these rights in concert with other members of their community..
机译：《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第二十七条是具有法律约束力和可辩护的少数民族保护规定。它规定：“在存在少数民族，宗教或语言上的少数群体的国家，与这些群体的其他成员共同生活的少数族裔人士不得享有享受其自身文化，自称和实践其权利的权利。自己的宗教或使用自己的语言。”也许由于其消极，薄弱和合格的术语，太多的法律学者对这篇文章持不屑一顾的态度，表明他们认为这是对少数民族保护的不充分措施。本论文旨在通过对以下四个关键问题的分析来解决第27条是仅仅是另一个措施不足还是资源不足的问题：（i）范围问题；（ii）定义性问题；（iii）权利人问题； （iv）义务问题。第27条的谨慎用语引起了很多混乱和争议，但是联合国人权委员会的做法有助于澄清许多重要的争论点。尽管许多缔约国提出了相反的争执，但第27条具有普遍的范围和适用性，仅有两个较小但重要的例外。权利持有人是属于非多数种族，民族，土著，种族，宗教或语言社区的人，尽管她有权行使第27条所规定的个人权利，但她仍然享有并行使该权利。与她所在社区的其他成员合作。缔约国有义务确保属于少数群体的人拥有这些权利。因此，我建议对第27条的解释应如下：缔约国负有义务，也可能有积极义务，以确保属于非多数种族，民族，土著，种族，宗教或语言社区的人有个人享受自己的文化，信仰和实践自己的宗教以及使用自己的语言的权利，包括与社区其他成员一起行使这些权利的权利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Molos, Dimitrios Jim.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Ethnic studies.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 157 p.
  • 总页数 157
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号