• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >An Organizational Systems Approach to the Causes of Academic Cheating: Interactions Among Rule Clarity, Purpose, and Role in School.
【24h】

An Organizational Systems Approach to the Causes of Academic Cheating: Interactions Among Rule Clarity, Purpose, and Role in School.

机译：一种用于组织学术作弊原因的组织系统方法：规则清晰，目的和在学校中的作用之间的相互作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Academic cheating attracts considerable attention as a problem that appears to undermine society's effort to prepare young people for responsible civic participation. Despite intense scrutiny, researchers continue to debate its causes. This investigation tested the application of an organizational systems theoretical approach to cheating. The experimental design included mixed methods and a sample involving grade 7--12 students, teachers, and parents in one international school. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six versions of an investigator-devised hypothetical collaborative learning scenario. Each version of the scenario varied according to three levels of rule clarity and two levels of purpose. Survey item one asked participants to read the scenario and rate whether or not they thought cheating had occurred. Survey item two asked participants to report a reason for the rating judgment by selecting from five button-box options and/or writing in their own open-ended comment. Separate analyses of variance were conducted for the rating data. Results showed that the rule clarity variable had a significant effect on teacher (not student or parent) judgments and the purpose variable had a significant effect on parent (not student or teacher) judgments. An interaction effect was found for the teacher data set. A content analysis of the follow-up responses found that four factors accounted for rating judgments: the clarity of rules, the purpose of the task, the nature of student collaboration, and school policy. The groups consistently reported that the attribution of cheating depended on the teacher's rule communication. Unclear rules can lead to a gray area in the interpretation of student intentions and behaviors. The role of grades is a further source of confusion. Findings support the theory that academic cheating has roots in the social environment of schooling. School leaders need to ensure that all community members understand and are in agreement about academic expectations.
机译：学术作弊吸引了相当多的关注，因为这个问题似乎破坏了社会为年轻人做好负责任的公民参与做准备的努力。尽管进行了严格的审查，研究人员仍在争论其原因。这项调查测试了组织系统理论方法在作弊中的应用。实验设计包括混合方法和一个样本，样本涉及一所国际学校的7--12年级学生，老师和家长。参与者被随机分配到研究人员设计的假设性协作学习方案的六个版本之一。场景的每个版本根据规则清晰度的三个级别和目的的两个级别而变化。一项调查要求参与者阅读情景并评价他们是否认为已经发生作弊行为。问卷调查第二项要求参与者通过从五个按钮框选项中进行选择和/或在自己的开放式评论中进行撰写，以报告做出评分判断的原因。对评级数据进行了方差的单独分析。结果表明，规则清晰度变量对老师（而非学生或父母）的判断有显着影响，而目的变量对父母（而非学生或老师）的判断有显着影响。发现了教师数据集的交互作用。对后续反应的内容分析发现，评分判断是由四个因素造成的：规则的清晰性，任务的目的，学生合作的性质和学校政策。各组一致报告，作弊的归因取决于教师的规则交流。不清楚的规则可能会导致学生意图和行为的解释出现灰色区域。成绩的作用是造成混乱的另一个原因。研究结果支持这样的理论，即学术作弊源于学校教育的社会环境。学校领导者需要确保所有社区成员理解并就学业期望达成共识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blanchard, Robert Burns, Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    Lehigh University.;

  • 授予单位 Lehigh University.;
  • 学科 Education Leadership.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 103 p.
  • 总页数 103
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号