首页> 外文学位 >Naturalistic decision making in aviation: Understanding the decision making process of experienced naval aviators during novel or unexpected situations in flight.
【24h】

Naturalistic decision making in aviation: Understanding the decision making process of experienced naval aviators during novel or unexpected situations in flight.

机译:航空中的自然决策:了解有经验的海军飞行员在新型或意外飞行情况下的决策过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the decision making process of experienced naval aviators during novel or unexpected situations in flight. Specifically, the study focuses on problems that these aviators encountered and examines what information and strategies were used by these individuals in dealing with their issues.; Eleven experienced F/A-18 naval aviators were interviewed using the Critical Decision Method. Data from these interviews was then analyzed in two steps: (a) first, separately for each participant (within-participant analysis); and then (b) across participants (between-participant analysis) in order to identify themes and patterns that emerged. Additionally, two member checks occurred during the study, after each step of data analysis.; Findings of the study address the following six areas: (a) the types of problems that arose; (b) how the aviators identified problems as novel or unexpected; (c) how the aviators first identified the existence of a problem; (d) cues and factors that were noticed and considered by the aviators throughout their decision making process; (e) strategies utilized by the aviators; and (f) difficulties that the aviators encountered in selecting and implementing these strategies.; Findings of the study are discussed in relation to the literature on decision making, aviation, and human factors. Support is found for Klein's Recognition-Primed Decision model, Orasanu and Fischer's Aviation Decision-Process model, and Endsley's work on situation awareness. Additionally, the findings identify the importance of two contextual factors in the aviation environment that have not been addressed previously: (a) the purpose of the flight (combat versus non-combat); and (b) the flight operation environment (shore-based versus carrier-based). These two factors were found to influence each other in addition to impacting the saliency of certain cues and factors for the aviators. Based on these findings, a model of the Aviator Decision Making Process is developed, thereby contributing to current aviation decision making theory. Implications of the findings for practice are discussed, including the importance of educating aviators on cues and factors that they should be considering in various types of situations, such as when flying off of aircraft carriers or engaging in combat. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are also provided.
机译:这项研究考察了经验丰富的海军飞行员在飞行中新颖或意外情况下的决策过程。具体而言,该研究着眼于这些飞行员​​遇到的问题,并研究了这些人在处理其问题时使用了哪些信息和策略。使用关键决策方法采访了11名经验丰富的F / A-18海军飞行员。然后分两个步骤分析这些访谈的数据:(a)首先,针对每个参与者分别进行(参与者内分析);然后(b)在参与者之间(参与者之间的分析)以识别出现的主题和模式。此外,在数据分析的每个步骤之后,在研究过程中进行了两次成员检查。研究的结果涉及以下六个领域:(a)出现的问题类型; (b)飞行员如何确定问题是新颖的还是未曾预料到的; (c)飞行员如何首先确定问题的存在; (d)飞行员在整个决策过程中注意到和考虑的线索和因素; (e)飞行员采用的策略; (f)飞行员在选择和实施这些战略时遇到的困难;结合有关决策,航空和人为因素的文献对研究结果进行了讨论。找到了对Klein的识别为主导的决策模型,Orasanu和Fischer的航空决策过程模型以及Endsley在态势感知方面的工作的支持。此外,调查结果还确定了航空环境中两个以前尚未解决的背景因素的重要性:(a)飞行的目的(战斗与非战斗); (b)飞行运行环境(陆上与舰载)。发现这两个因素除了会影响某些提示的显着性和影响飞行员的因素外,还会相互影响。基于这些发现,开发了飞行员决策过程的模型,从而为当前的航空决策理论做出了贡献。讨论了研究结果对实践的影响,包括对飞行员进行提示和在各种情况下(例如,从航空母舰上起飞或进行战斗时应考虑的因素)进行教育的重要性。还提供了研究的局限性和对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Denihan, Melissa Beth.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Cognitive.; Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 264 p.
  • 总页数 264
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学;工业心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号