• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of free trade between the U.S. and the EU: A case study of the U.S./Chile FTA and the EU/Chile FTA.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of free trade between the U.S. and the EU: A case study of the U.S./Chile FTA and the EU/Chile FTA.

机译：美国与欧盟之间自由贸易的比较分析：以美国/智利自由贸易协定和欧盟/智利自由贸易协定为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Unlike many studies that assess the impacts of free trade agreements (FTAs), this thesis is a study of the negotiated outcomes in FTAs between the United States (U.S.) and Chile, and the European Union (EU) and Chile. Existing negotiation literature pertains to multilateral trade talks, dispute settlements or bilateral one good trade agreements. Studies regarding the negotiation process and other factors influencing outcomes in comprehensive FTAs are rare. In order to address this gap in the literature, this thesis is an analysis of how and why the FTA between Chile and the U.S. differs from the FTA between Chile and the EU, in particular with regards to sensitive agricultural goods. As the two agreements were negotiated and implemented within similar time frames, and thus a similar political and economic environment within Chile, it is possible to use the theory-testing method of difference case study approach. This framework helps to test the validity of one leading theory of economic negotiations posited by Odell. Moreover, any shortcomings in the applicability of Odell's theory to these specific negotiations can be ascertained using this methodology. Odell's theory postulates that negotiated outcomes are a result of market conditions, domestic politics, and negotiator beliefs and strategies. In addition to causality in FTA negotiations, the case study will ascertain how the U.S. and the EU differed in their approaches to negotiating free trade. Conclusions drawn from this study include that there are varying degrees of sensitivity in agriculture which result in special and specific negotiated outcomes. Furthermore, the U.S. and the EU differ in their approaches to free trade which inevitably affects negotiated outcomes. Overall, Odell's theory is a competent basis for understanding these FTA negotiated outcomes. Additional theoretical understanding of the impact of the institutional considerations in the negotiation process and existing domestic policies could however add to the comprehensiveness of this theory.
机译：与许多评估自由贸易协定（FTA）影响的研究不同，本论文研究的是美国（美国）和智利以及欧盟（EU）和智利之间的FTA谈判成果。现有的谈判文献涉及多边贸易谈判，争端解决或双边良好贸易协定。关于谈判过程和影响全面自由贸易协定结果的其他因素的研究很少。为了解决文献中的这一空白，本论文分析了智利和美国之间的FTA与智利和欧盟之间的FTA有何不同以及为什么有所不同，特别是在敏感农产品方面。由于这两个协议是在相似的时间框架内谈判和实施的，因此在智利内部也存在相似的政治和经济环境，因此有可能使用差异案例研究方法的理论检验方法。这一框架有助于检验奥德尔提出的一种领先的经济谈判理论的有效性。此外，使用这种方法可以确定奥德尔理论在这些具体谈判中的适用性的任何缺陷。奥德尔的理论假设，谈判结果是市场条件，国内政治以及谈判者信念和策略的结果。除了在FTA谈判中具有因果关系外，该案例研究还将确定美国和欧盟在谈判自由贸易的方式上有何不同。这项研究得出的结论包括，农业对农业的敏感程度不同，这会导致特殊和特定的协商结果。此外，美国和欧盟在自由贸易的方式上存在差异，这不可避免地影响了谈判结果。总体而言，奥德尔的理论是理解这些自由贸易协定谈判成果的有力依据。但是，对制度因素在谈判过程中的影响以及现有国内政策的其他理论理解也可以增加该理论的全面性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sharp, Misti Dawn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.;Political Science General.;Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 232 p.
  • 总页数 232
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号