首页> 外文学位 >Moral rights: A comparative history of their development and application in civil and common law jurisdictions.
【24h】

Moral rights: A comparative history of their development and application in civil and common law jurisdictions.

机译:精神权利:在民法和英美法系司法管辖区中其发展和适用的比较历史。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It has become traditional to divide the history of moral rights on a jurisdictional basis, between civil and common law systems. This survey of the historical background and development of moral rights principles reveals that the sources and conceptual underpinnings of copyright law are much closer than is generally realised. Furthermore, the development of moral rights jurisprudence in France is clearly litigation-based and informed by property principles that are more usually associated with common law jurisdictions. By contrast, what moral rights are incompletely recognised in the US have developed from a statutory framework predicated on an incentive-access paradigm, in a process that is more recognisably civiliste in method. However, the increasing drive to harmonise copyright provisions globally will not be without its problems---not least because of the clash of the two cultures of author-centred versus more economically focussed, utilitarian copyright formulations.
机译:在大陆法系和普通法系之间在管辖权的基础上划分精神权利的历史已成为传统。这项对精神权利原则的历史背景和发展的调查表明,版权法的渊源和概念基础比通常所认识的要近得多。此外,法国的精神权利法学发展显然是基于诉讼的,并以财产法为基础,而财产法通常与普通法管辖区有关。相比之下,美国的不完全承认的精神权利,是根据以激励获取范式为基础的法定框架发展起来的,这一过程在方法上更是公认的平民主义。但是,在全球范围内统一版权规定的日益增长的驱动力将不可避免地带来问题-尤其是因为以作者为中心的两种文化与更加注重经济的功利主义版权表达方式发生了冲突。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dickson, Craig James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 99 p.
  • 总页数 99
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号