• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The effects of a socioscientific issues instructional model in secondary agricultural education on students' content knowledge, scientific reasoning ability, argumentation skills, and views of the nature of science.
【24h】

The effects of a socioscientific issues instructional model in secondary agricultural education on students' content knowledge, scientific reasoning ability, argumentation skills, and views of the nature of science.

机译：中学农业教育中的社会科学问题教学模型对学生的内容知识，科学推理能力，论证技巧以及对科学本质的看法的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a socioscientific issues-based instructional model on secondary agricultural education students' content knowledge, scientific reasoning ability, argumentation skills, and views of the nature of science. This study utilized a pre-experimental, single group pretest-posttest design to assess the impacts of a nine-week unit that incorporated a socioscientific issue into instruction on secondary agriculture students' agriscience content knowledge, scientific reasoning ability, argumentation skills, and views of the nature of science. The population for this study was Florida's secondary students enrolled in agricultural education. The accessible population was students enrolled in Agriscience Foundations classes in Florida. A convenience sample of Florida's Agriscience Foundations teachers attending a summer professional development or Chapter Officer Leadership Training session was taken.;Paired-samples t tests were conducted to determine the impact the treatment had on students' agriscience content knowledge on distal and proximal assessments, as well as on students' scientific reasoning ability, argumentation skills related to number of argumentation justifications and quality of those justifications, and views of the nature of science. Paired-samples t tests were also conducted to determine whether the treatment yielded results with middle school or high school students.;Statistical analysis found significant improvements in students' agriscience content knowledge, scientific reasoning ability, and argumentation skills. High school students' scores resulted in significant improvements in proximal content knowledge assessments and argumentation justification quality. Middle school students' scores resulted in significant improvements in proximal content knowledge assessments and scientific reasoning ability. No significant difference was found between students' views of the nature of science before and after the treatment.;These findings indicate that socioscientific issues-based instruction can provide benefits for students in agricultural education. Teacher educators should work with teachers to maximize the learning that can occur through the various aspects of socioscientific issues-based instruction. Curriculum focusing on socioscientific issues-based instruction should be developed for specific courses in agricultural education. Finally, further investigation should be conducted to better understand how the aspects of socioscientific issues-based instruction can be altered to further enhance student learning.
机译：这项研究的目的是确定基于社会科学问题的教学模型对中等农业教育学生的内容知识，科学推理能力，论证技巧以及对科学本质的看法的影响。这项研究利用实验前的单组前测后测设计，评估了一个为期九周的单元的影响，该单元将社会科学问题纳入了对中学农业学生的农业科学内容知识，科学推理能力，论证技巧和观点的指导。科学的本质。这项研究的人口是佛罗里达州接受农业教育的中学生。容易接近的人群是在佛罗里达州参加农业科学基金会课程的学生。抽取了佛罗里达州农业科学基金会教师参加夏季专业培训或分会干事领导力培训课程的便利样本；对样本进行了t检验，以确定该处理对学生对远端和近端评估的农业科学内容知识的影响，例如以及学生的科学推理能力，与论证理由数量和论据质量相关的论证技巧，以及对科学本质的看法。还进行了配对样本t检验，以确定该疗法对中学生或高中生是否有效果。统计分析发现，学生的农业科学内容知识，科学推理能力和论证技能得到了显着提高。高中生的分数显着提高了近端内容知识评估和论证依据的质量。中学生的分数显着提高了近端内容知识评估和科学推理能力。在治疗前后，学生对科学本质的看法之间没有发现显着差异。这些发现表明，基于社会科学问题的教学可以为学生提供农业教育方面的好处。教师教育者应与教师合作，以最大限度地通过基于社会科学问题的教学的各个方面进行学习。应针对农业教育的特定课程，开发以社会科学问题为基础的教学课程。最后，应该进行进一步的调查，以更好地了解如何改变基于社会科学问题的教学方式，以进一步增强学生的学习能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shoulders, Catherine Woglom.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Education Sciences.;Education Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 585 p.
  • 总页数 585
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号