• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Global Governance and Food Security Discourses: The FAO and the Via Campesina.
【24h】

Global Governance and Food Security Discourses: The FAO and the Via Campesina.

机译：全球治理和粮食安全问题：粮农组织和坎佩西纳大街。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research uses discourse analysis to critically examine the convergences and divergences in the post-2007-08 food crisis discourses on food security and sovereignty of two international organizations active in global food security governance, the FAO and Via Campesina. Rooted in the critical agri-food studies literature, which adopts a multidimensional approach to the challenges of the global food system, and drawing on critical political economy and global governance frameworks, this research is premised on the assumption that it is important that the global food security governance regime, as represented by the FAO, take into account many of the concerns of the Via Campesina with respect to a focus on rights, agency, participation, and transparency. It is shown that the two organizations have many commonalities relating to calls for improved governance of international agricultural trade, improved regional level governance, and in the role for states in encouraging global food security governance solutions. This research also reveals that shifts in the global discourses surrounding food security are taking place, there are now significant divergences between the two organizations in terms of approaches to agency and vulnerability, the role of current multilateral institutions, and the right to define the means through which ones food is produced, which in turn represent fundamental differences in norms and principles that frame each organization's participation in food security initiatives. These differences, along with powerful hegemonic structures, currently limit the possibility for change in line with food sovereignty objectives to occur. Furthermore, it is shown that intelligent agency will be an important component of any possibility for moving the food security regime forward towards the more progressive food security and sovereignty directions envisioned by the Via Campesina. In the long-term, it is this intelligent agency which may be able to bring about the participation, inclusivity, and the type of rational discourse seen as needed in order to bring about more coherent, comprehensive global food security governance, and a more food secure world.
机译：这项研究使用话语分析来严格审查2007-08年后粮食危机话语中两个活跃在全球粮食安全治理中的国际组织，粮农组织和Via Campesina在粮食安全和主权问题上的趋同和分歧。这项研究源于重要的农业食品研究文献，该文献采用多维方法应对全球粮食系统的挑战，并借鉴了重要的政治经济学和全球治理框架，其前提是，全球粮食对全球粮食至关重要。以粮农组织为代表的安全治理制度考虑到了坎佩西纳大街（Via Campesina）在关注权利，代理，参与和透明度方面的许多关切。事实表明，这两个组织在呼吁改善国际农产品贸易治理，改善区域一级治理以及各国在鼓励全球粮食安全治理解决方案方面的作用方面有许多共同点。这项研究还表明，围绕粮食安全的全球讨论正在发生变化，两个组织之间在代理和脆弱性方法，当前多边机构的作用以及通过以下方式定义手段的权利方面存在着巨大分歧。生产哪种粮食，这又代表了构成每个组织参与粮食安全倡议的规范和原则的根本差异。这些差异以及强大的霸权结构目前限制了根据粮食主权目标发生变化的可能性。此外，事实表明，明智的代理机构将成为任何可能的重要组成部分，它将使粮食安全制度朝着坎佩西纳大街所设想的更加进步的粮食安全和主权方向发展。从长远来看，正是这个聪明的机构可能能够带来参与，包容性以及为实现更连贯，全面的全球粮食安全治理和更多粮食所需的理性话语类型。安全的世界。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drummond, Erica Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Geography.;International law.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号