• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Capital accumulation and the information industries of mainland China.
【24h】

Capital accumulation and the information industries of mainland China.

机译：资本积累与中国大陆的信息产业。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Analysts associate Chinese economic development with the movement of firms seeking the lowest wages available worldwide. However, firms in the information industries transfer innovation and capital to mainland China, even when they are threatened with fines for violating United States and Taiwanese restrictions on the movement of sensitive technologies to communist countries. Theories of comparative advantage have no way to explain what motivates firms to transfer sensitive technologies to a nation with a comparative advantage for low wages. Neither do theories of the developmental state explain this. Chinese development policies appear to have successfully attracted foreign firms of the semiconductor sector. However, parallel policies to attract programming activities have not succeeded, though the sensitivity of programming firms to wages should make this sector the most likely sector to move to China. Theories that attribute development to the state do not explain how a state could effectively develop the semiconductor sector and not programming.; To explain these dynamics, this dissertation turns to theories of the world system. At this stage of its systemic cycles of accumulation, the world system is experiencing a crisis of overaccumulation. Falling rates of profit motivate firms to seek new markets, and the size of the market draws attention to China. It is to take advantage of this emerging market that hardware and semiconductor firms establish themselves in China. Likewise, it is the limits of the market for programming in China that explain the modest movement of that sector.; To further explain the movement of sensitive technologies, this dissertation considers the influence of firm networks on tech transfers. Mainland China and Taiwan have experienced different patterns of development as a result of the market opportunities they offer firms. However, mainland China and Taiwan share a dependency on foreign firms and technologies. Firms from core countries continue to control tech transfers. They outsource innovation only where they are able to restrict the development of their outsourcing partners to contain the effects of outsourcing on their profits. Thus, dependency continues to define development in mainland China and Taiwan and tends to preserve the economic order of the world system.
机译：分析师将中国的经济发展与寻求全球最低工资的公司的运动联系起来。但是，即使信息产业的公司因违反美国和台湾对敏感技术向共产国家转移的限制而面临罚款的威胁，它们也会向中国大陆转移创新和资本。比较优势理论无法解释促使企业将敏感技术转让给具有低工资相对优势的国家的动机。发展状态的理论也不能解释这一点。中国的发展政策似乎已成功吸引了半导体行业的外国公司。然而，尽管编程公司对工资的敏感性应使该部门成为最有可能转移到中国的部门，但吸引编程活动的平行政策并未成功。将发展归因于国家的理论并不能解释国家如何有效地发展半导体业而不是编程。为了解释这些动力学，本文转向世界体系的理论。在其系统性积累周期的这一阶段，世界体系正在经历过度积累的危机。利润率下降促使企业寻求新市场，而市场规模吸引了中国的注意力。硬件和半导体公司正是利用这一新兴市场在中国建立自己的优势。同样，正是中国节目市场的局限性解释了该行业的适度发展。为了进一步解释敏感技术的发展，本文考虑了企业网络对技术转让的影响。由于中国大陆和台湾为公司提供的市场机会，它们经历了不同的发展模式。但是，中国大陆和台湾对外国公司和技术有依赖性。核心国家的公司继续控制技术转让。他们仅在能够限制外包合作伙伴发展以遏制外包对其利润的影响的情况下外包创新。因此，依附关系继续定义着中国大陆和台湾的发展，并倾向于维护世界体系的经济秩序。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kessler, Dimitri.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会结构和社会关系;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号