首页> 外文学位 >Le care invisible: Genre, vulnerabilite et domination.
【24h】

Le care invisible: Genre, vulnerabilite et domination.

机译:看不见的护理:流派,脆弱和统治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The starting point of this thesis in feminist political philosophy is first and foremost a preoccupying empirical record. In spite of all the progress made in the past fifty years in matters of gender equality, the division of labor between men and women, at home as well as in the workplace, still persists in our democratic societies. In line with a decidedly feminist perspective, combining the contemporary reflections on the politics of care and a post-marxist feminist method, this thesis offers a plausible interpretation of this persisting division.;In the first part, the analysis of two current gender equality issues, of the financial support to family caregivers (chap. 1) and of the economic recognition of the work done by mothers and housewives (chap. 2), leads me to the following preliminary conclusion: in spite of their goals, these political measures actually contribute to maintain the status quo, indeed, to further confine women to their traditional roles.;In a second part, I argue that these measures, as well as the feminist approaches which underlie and support them, are themselves derived from processes of domination. This argument comprises four parts. First, I discuss the political theories of care. In shifting the debate from an ethic to a politic of care, these philosophers both wanted to illustrate the dimension of caring as an activity and to dissociate care from gender. I suggest that in spite of their goals, they still tend to stick to the differentialist logic which strengthens the links between woman and care when they put forward policies on gender equality (chap. 3). This logic of difference is actually closely linked to their notion of gender. Indeed, in distinguishing the socially constructed gender from the biological sex, their constructionist approach has the effect of confirming natural sexual differences (chap. 4). Man still being the norm and woman the «difference» under this view, women come to internalize the idea of a difference located in their own bodies (chap. 5). Finally, I bring to attention the very limited conception of care of these theorists, defined as care for the most vulnerable (infants, the sick, the old and the handicapped persons). This reductive conception actually contributes to invisibilize the largest part of the work done daily by women in support of those whose dependency doesn't come under the most «extreme» form: the care of independents, that is, all the services (domestic, caring, reproductive and sexual services) devalued by their recipients while they constitute the condition for their «independence». As caring for «independents» remains invisible, women are ascribed to traditional roles and the most «powerful» are free to keep on dominating both institutions and the knowledge produced about it. Making this «invisibilized» part of caring visible, and replacing our common vulnerability at the heart of the political reflection on justice, are the first steps towards a radical democratic society, that is, a society freed from gender domination.
机译:女性主义政治哲学论文的出发点首先是一个令人关注的经验记录。尽管过去五十年来在性别平等问题上取得了所有进展,但在我们的民主社会中,男女在家庭以及工作场所的分工仍然存在。本着明确的女权主义观点,结合了当代对“斜体”护理政治的反思和后马克思主义的女权主义方法,本文为这种持续的分裂提供了合理的解释。对当前的两个性别平等问题,对家庭照料者的财政支持(第1章)以及对母亲和家庭主妇所做工作的经济认可(第2章)的分析,使我得出以下初步结论:这些政治措施实际上有助于维持现状,确实进一步将妇女限制在其传统角色中。;在第二部分中,我认为这些措施以及支持和支持她们的女权主义方法是自己来自统治过程。该论点包括四个部分。首先,我讨论护理的政治理论。在将辩论从伦理关怀转向政治关怀时,这些哲学家都想说明关怀活动的规模,并希望将关怀与性别分离。我建议,尽管他们有目标,但在提出性别平等政策时,他们仍然倾向于坚持差别主义的逻辑,这种逻辑加强了妇女与照料之间的联系(第3章)。这种差异逻辑实际上与他们的性别观念紧密相关。实际上,在将社会建构的性别与生物性别区别开来时,他们的建构主义方法具有确认自然性别差异的作用(第4章)。在这种观点下,男人仍然是常态,女人仍然是“差异”,女人开始将存在于自己体内的差异的想法内化(第5章)。最后,我要提请注意这些理论家的关怀概念非常有限,定义为对最弱势群体(婴儿,病人,老人和残障人士)的关怀。这种简化的概念实际上有助于使妇女日常工作中的大部分工作变得不透明,以支持那些依赖程度不是最“极端”形式的妇女:独立人士的照顾,接受者贬值的所有服务(家庭,照料,生殖和性服务)构成了他们“独立”的条件。由于对“独立者”的照顾仍然无形,妇女被赋予了传统角色,而最“有能力的”妇女则可以自由地继续统治这两个机构以及由此产生的知识。使这种“隐形化”成为关怀的一部分,并取代对正义的政治思考核心的共同脆弱性,是迈向激进的民主社会的第一步,即,一个没有性别主导的社会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hamrouni, Naima.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Political Science General.;Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 290 p.
  • 总页数 290
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号