• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Foreign language instructed programs in public universities in Egypt: Implications for resource diversification, quality and equity in higher education.
【24h】

Foreign language instructed programs in public universities in Egypt: Implications for resource diversification, quality and equity in higher education.

机译：埃及公立大学的外语教学计划：对高等教育的资源多样化，质量和公平的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study seeks to assess the impact of tuition fees of the Foreign language Instructed Programs (FLIP) at Cairo University on increasing other-than-governmental resources for these programs as well as for the university, increasing student satisfaction with the quality of education, and maintaining equitable access. The study uses a theoretical framework based on the rationale of cost sharing in higher education. It investigates the policies of cost sharing that have been used in Egyptian universities, and examines the methods and steps taken toward solving problems in higher education in Egypt through the application of cost sharing.;The study used a mixed method approach to collect the necessary data to conduct the analysis. This is a case study of a single university. In particular, the Faculty of Economics and Political Science (FEPS) and the Faculty of Commerce (FC) at Cairo University were chosen for the study. A total of 450 student survey questionnaires and 18 individual interviews served as the basis of the analysis, in addition to some financial statements and documents review. Three implications of the FLIP were identified and formed the three research questions in this study.;The findings show that there is some positive effect of the FLIPs in terms of offering some funding to the university general budget and in diversifying the supply to meet the greater diversity of learner demand. However, the findings reveal that revenues generated from the FLIP actually are a replacement to public funds and not a supplement to the underfunded university budget. There is a significant difference between students in the FLIP and those in the Traditional Arabic Program in terms of socioeconomic status in that students in the FLIP programs come from families of a much higher income level. The study concludes that equity is jeopardized through the model of the FLIP.;However, when assessing student satisfaction and self-perception of the quality of the program of study, it was found that none of the FLIPs comes in first place. The students in the Traditional Arabic Programs (TAP) in the FEPS were the most satisfied group. The analysis shows that there are other elements that affect student satisfaction levels. These factors represent the dimensions of quality that would have to be taken into account alongside with providing extra funds to the universities. Increasing funding without the appropriate management or without improving teaching methods will not automatically improve student satisfaction. The FLIPs should be given more autonomy to be able to react in a flexible way toward curriculum reforms, and this autonomy should also extend to the operation of expenses in order to work more efficiently and thus be held accountable for their action.
机译：这项研究旨在评估开罗大学外语教学计划（FLIP）的学费对增加这些计划以及大学的非政府资源，提高学生对教育质量的满意度的影响，以及保持公平的访问。该研究使用了基于高等教育成本分担原理的理论框架。它调查了埃及大学所采用的成本分摊政策，并探讨了通过应用成本分摊解决埃及高等教育问题的方法和步骤。该研究采用了混合方法来收集必要的数据进行分析。这是一所大学的案例研究。特别是，选择了开罗大学的经济政治学院（FEPS）和商业学院（FC）进行研究。除某些财务报表和文件审查外，总共进行了450次学生调查问卷和18次个人访谈作为分析的基础。确定了FLIP的三个含义，并构成了本研究中的三个研究问题。研究结果表明，FLIP在为大学的总预算提供一些资金以及使供应多样化以满足更大的需求方面具有积极作用。学习者需求的多样性。但是，调查结果表明，FLIP产生的收入实际上是对公共资金的替代，而不是对资金不足的大学预算的补充。就社会经济地位而言，FLIP计划的学生与传统阿拉伯计划的学生之间存在显着差异，因为FLIP计划的学生来自收入水平更高的家庭。该研究得出结论，通过FLIP模型损害了公平性。但是，在评估学生对学习计划质量的满意度和自我认知时，发现没有FLIP排在首位。 FEPS的传统阿拉伯计划（TAP）中的学生是最满意的群体。分析表明，还有其他因素会影响学生的满意度。这些因素代表了在向大学提供额外资金的同时必须考虑的质量范围。如果没有适当的管理或没有改进的教学方法，增加资金投入将不会自动提高学生的满意度。应该赋予FLIP更大的自主权，以便能够灵活地对课程改革做出反应，并且这种自主权还应该扩展到支出运作，以便更有效地工作，从而对其行动负责。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sabry, Manar A.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Education Finance.;Education Policy.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号